CFAES Give Today
Agronomic Crops Network

Ohio State University Extension

CFAES

C.O.R.N. Newsletter: 2016-1

  1. Introducing Dr. Kelley Tilmon

    Author(s): Kelley Tilmon

    In January, Dr. Kelley Tilmon joined the faculty of the Department of Entomology as an Associate Professor and State Specialist for field crop entomology. Her extension, research, and teaching programs will focus on the management of insect pests of agronomic crops. She will be based out of the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC) campus in Wooster.  Kelley has an M.S. in entomology from the University of Delaware, a Ph.D. in entomology from Cornell University, and for the past 10 years has served as the soybean entomologist for South Dakota at South Dakota State University, with extension and research responsibilities.  Her contact information is 330-202-3529 and tilmon.1@osu.edu

  2. More on Transgenic Traits and Hybrid Performance

    There were 17 different sets of transgenic traits evaluated in 2015 Ohio Corn Performance Test (OCPT) representing 22 technology products that are currently being marketed by seed companies. As the type and number of transgenic traits increases each year, the question arises as to whether these different traits affect hybrid performance. Using data from the 2015 OCPT, we’ve grouped hybrids based on the type and number of insect (Bt) and herbicide resistance they contain. Corn borer, corn rootworm, or lepidopteran insect injury were negligible in the 2015 OCPT trials. In Table 1, traits are listed by the insect they help control - corn borer, corn rootworm, or lepidopteran insects and whether they contain glyphosate or glufosinate herbicide tolerance. We’ve omitted trait sets that had two or less entries because so few entries mean that the data reflect individual hybrids more that traits (Nafziger, 2010). Even those groups that are shown can have their average performance skewed by one or more entries, so keep this in mind when interpreting the results. These results suggest that no set of traits performed consistently “much better” or “much worse” than other sets and the numbers of traits was not highly correlated with yield performance among these groups.

    Table 1.  Grain yield of hybrids grouped by insect resistance and herbicide tolerance traits, 2015 OCPT.

     

    Region

     

    SW/SC/C

    NW

    NC/NE

    Trait Set

    No.

    Yield

    No.

    Yield

    No.

    Yield

    None

    7

    241

    7

    196

    12

    181

    CB2+GT1

    27

    250

    25

    196

    8

    188

    CB1+GT1+LL1

    5

    265

    5

    205

    4

    198

    CB1+RW1+GT1+LL1

    10

    247

    7

    197

    5

    184

    LEP1+CB1+RW1+GT1+LL1

    1

    256

    5

    195

    2

    194

    CB3+RW3+GT1+LL1

    38

    251

    52

    195

    38

    188

    CB2+RW1+GT1

    13

    249

    9

    198

    7

    182

    CB2+GT1+LL1

    25

    252

    15

    199

    14

    192

    LEP1+CB1+RW1+GT1+LL1+DT1

    2

    247

    3

    199

    2

    190

    NOTE: SW/SC/C and NC/NE OCPT regions have three locations, NW Region has two locations.           CB = corn borer Bt; RW = corn rootworm Bt; LEP = lepidopteran Bt; GT = glyphosate tolerance;    LL = glufosinate (Liberty) tolerance; DT = drought tolerance (not transgenic).  The number after the trait indicates the number of different events of that type.

    Reference

    Nafziger, E. 2010. Traits and Hybrid Performance, 2010 - The Bulletin University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign http://bulletin.ipm.illinois.edu/print.php?id=1443

  3. Host Resistance to soybean diseases – the best return on investment

    Author(s): Anne Dorrance

    The first and most economical approach (a.k.a. save money) to manage many of the pathogens that impact soybean in the state of Ohio is to pick varieties that have the right resistance package.  If the resistance is effective – then there is no need for any further measures during the season.  The soybean plant can take care of itself, especially during years when conditions are favorable for disease development.

    We routinely use both resistant and susceptible varieties/germplasm in our test locations.  Germplasm are soybean lines that may have come from another country or are in the breeding pipeline of a public breeder – they are not quite ready for “prime time” but the genetics are on the way to keep improving soybean varieties.  A major contribution to soybean development from the public land grants has been the assessment and genetic discovery of key genes that contribute not only to yield but also to disease, pest, and abiotic stress.

    Some examples from our studies in Ohio.

    Symptoms of sudden death syndrome close up.  Picture on right is a susceptible variety with early symptoms.


    1. Sudden death syndrome.  I don’t talk about this disease too often, as it is mainly limited to a few geographic regions in this state, is very sporadic and unpredictable when it will occur, is associated with soybean cyst nematode and the yield losses have not been as impressive as other pathogens.  However, we have evaluated new germplasm every year as well as some of the seed treatments.  Here is some data from 2014 when disease symptoms were severe.

    Test A.  Examined the performance of two cultivars with SCN resistance but one is SDS susceptible (Cultivar A) and the second is Resistant (Cultivar B).

    Soybean Variety

    SDS severity

    Final Yield

    Cultivar A

    303

    57.9

    Cultivar B

    1.7

    61.6

     

     

     

    Test B.  Evaluated the performance of soybean germplasm for resistance to SDS.  These are the checks, and this test demonstrates the variability in disease levels that we seem to face here in Ohio.

    Checks

    2014

    2015

    Resistant A

    2.8

    4.4

    Resistant B

    2.2

    nt

    Resistant C

    0.6

    nt

    Susceptible A

    27.8

    nt

    Susceptible B

    44.4

    28

     

    Disease severity of sudden death syndrome is measured first by the percentage of the plants within the plot that have symptoms of the disease followed by a score for the severity of the symptoms.  The score ranges from 1 to 9, where 1 is no disease; 2 to 5 the amount of the yellow and necrotic spots on the plants; 6 to 8 the amount of defoliation; 9 the amount of prematurely dead plants. nt indicates that the line was not tested. 

    Early and late symptoms of Sclerotinia stem rot.  Picture on the right has large sclerotia visible on the main stem.  The sclerotia survive in the soil for several years and serve as inoculum for the coming year.

    2. Sclerotinia white mold.  The resistance levels to this pathogen have slowly been improving over the years to the point that it is really hard to show the benefit of mid-season fungicide applications.  From 2014 we evaluated 4 cultivars in a field with a long and sordid history of white mold.

    Variety

    Percent Incidence Sclerotinia stem rot (no. of plants killed prematurely)

     

    2014

    Loc A-2015

    Loc B-2015

    A

    8

    nt

    nt

    B

    29

    nt

    nt

    C

    31

    0

    0

    D

    36

    0

    0


     

    3. Frogeye leaf spot.  This leaf pathogen has a wide range of responses among northern cultivars.  For the most part many of our varieties have resistance,however there are a few that are highly susceptible and do require a fungicide treatment mid-season.  This year we had two varieties planted at Western Research station and within the study they were placed throughout the study to measure the levels of disease within the field.  As you can see, the response was consistent across the field. 

    Variety

    Percent leaf area affected by frogeye leaf spot

     

    1

    2

    3

    4

    A

    0.3

    0.1

    0.7

    1

    B

    3.3

    4.0

    5.7

    4.8

    Early and late symptoms of Phytophthora damping-off and Phytophthora stem rot on highly susceptible varieties.  If partial resistance levels are high – then the plant will defend itself through the season and these symptoms will never develop.

     

    4. Phytophthora root and stem rot.  This disease is most common on poorly drained soils and we have recovered or found plants with symptoms in all of Ohio’s soybean production regions, it is not just a northwestern Ohio problem.  The key to managing this disease is with host resistance which is a combination of Rps genes and partial resistance (also known as tolerance & field resistance).  This past year under heavy flooding and disease pressure, several of the new public varieties had significantly higher yields than some of the older standards.  These varieties were also planted in 30 inch rows near the end of May, received between 15 and 20 inches of rain within 2 weeks after planting.

    Cultivar

    Resistance package

    Defiance

    Bu/A

    Paulding

    Bu/A

    Conrad

    no Rps genes/high partial resistance (PR)

    13.8

    7.2

    Dennison

    Rps1k + 3a, high PR

    25.3

    18.2

    Kottman

    Rps1k+3a, high PR

    20.4

    23.3

    Lorain

    Rps1c, high PR

    25.0

    21.6

    Sloan

    no Rps genes/low PR

    10.8

    6.8

    Streeter

    Rps1c + 3a, high PR

    22.3

    20.1

    Summit

    Rps1k + 3a, high PR

    24.0

    20.4

     

    For each of these diseases, companies use a different scoring system for resistance and on top of that, each company uses different values.  For example, for Phytophthora, companies will list which Rps gene(s) are present in the variety.  For Ohio, the gene stacks of Rps1c + 3a; Rps1k + 3a provide the best management, followed by single genes Rps1k, Rps3a, and Rps6

    For partial resistance towards Phytophthora, Sudden Death syndrome, frogeye leafspot or white mold, the scoring is very different.  Most often it is on a 1 to 9 scale and depending on the company, 1 can be great or it can be dead.  The only way to tell is to read the fine print in the tables.  Here is a tool to help you compare and record the information for the 2016 crop:

    Variety

    Company

    1=good

    or bad

    Phytophthora

    Rps gene

    Phytophthora score

    (partial resistance/tolerance)

    SCN

    SDS

    Frogeye

    Sclerotinia white mold

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    If you are having trouble assembling this information, work with your seed dealer or your county AGNR educator.  

     

     

     

  4. 2015 Northwest Ohio Corn Silage Test

    In 2015, 38 corn silage hybrids representing 13 commercial brands were evaluated in a joint trial with Michigan State University (MSU). One Ohio location is combined with Michigan's two southern (Zone 1) silage locations. The Ohio test site was located in our Northwest Region at Hoytville (Wood County). The two MSU sites were located in Branch and Lenawee counties, which are on the Ohio/Michigan state line.  The test results from the three 2015 locations are treated as one region. The plots were planted with 4-row air type planters and maintained by each respective state utilizing standard production practices. The center 2 rows were harvested with MSU’s self-propelled forage harvester. Silage tests were harvested uniformly as close to half milk line as possible. Near Infrared Reflectance (NIR) Quality Analysis was performed by MSU using their current procedures. Silage results present the percent dry matter of each hybrid plus green weight and dry weight as tons per acre. Other data presented include percent stand, the percentage of in vitro digestible dry matter, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber digestibility, crude protein and starch. Milk production in pounds per ton and pounds per acre were estimated using MILK2006 (UW-Madison Dairy Science Department).

    A complete summary of the Ohio results are available online at: http://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/silagetrials. More information on procedures and additional 2015 MSU silage test data can be viewed online at: http://www.varietytrials.msu.edu/corn. For more information on Ohio State crop variety testing, visit:  http://www.ag.ohio-state.edu/~perf.

  5. New Website Layout

    You probably noticed the new format of the C.O.R.N. newsletter in our last issue. The College has been updating all websites over the last couple of years for better security and functionality. While the template options were limited, we tried to make the website as user friendly as possible, helping you get to the information you want faster. The newsletter is now a tab on the main AgCrops webpage rather than its own website.

    If you have had a chance to browse the website, we would like your feedback about what you like or dislike on the website itself and the C.O.R.N. newsletter. Be sure to check out our events page as there are a lot of programs scheduled this winter around the state. For feedback you can email Greg Labarge, Labarge.1@osu.edu; Harold Watters, watters.35@osu.edu; or Amanda Douridas, Douridas.9@osu.edu.

  6. OSU’s Corn College workshop is Feb. 10

    Author(s): Sam Custer

    Producers and agriculture professionals can get an update on the 2016 corn market and learn how to budget for a profitable corn crop at a workshop led by farm management experts from the College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences at The Ohio State University.

    The 2016 Corn College is a daylong workshop offered on Feb. 10 that will focus on what farmers need to know to develop a successful corn growing operation, said Sam Custer, an Ohio State University Extension educator who is organizing the program.

    OSU Extension is CFAES’s outreach arm.

    The goal of the workshop, Custer said, is to help farmers focus on critical topics that can help them not only get the most bang for their buck, but also raise the profit potential of their farms.

    “We’ll offer producers a look at what the latest research shows as they work towards maximizing corn crop yields in an economical fashion,” he said. “Producers will be making some critical decisions this winter as they buy products to set up and plant their crops this spring.

    “Offering this workshop now will give them time to digest some key production information before they start to get their corn planted in April.”

    The workshop is taught by OSU Extension educators and specialists and will be held at The Andersons Marathon Ethanol, 5728 Sebring Warner Road in Greenville, Ohio.

    Topics will include:

    * 2016 market outlook.

    * Budgeting a profitable corn crop.

    * Agronomic practices that optimize profitability in corn production.

    * Nitrogen timing and needs during corn development.

    * Darke County on-farm research results, including nitrogen response and manure side dress.

    * Insect pressure on today’s genetics and future control.

    * Fungicide effects on disease, ear rot and yield in field corn.

    * Decision-making with high resolution crop imagery.

    Registration for the workshop is $50 and includes the program, handouts, breakfast and lunch. The registration flyer can be downloaded at http://go.osu.edu/corncollege. Contact Custer at 937-548-5215 for more information. The deadline to register is Feb. 3. Payment can be sent to OSU Extension, Darke County, 603 Wagner Ave., Greenville, Ohio 45331.

  7. Upcoming Ag Outlook Meetings

    Author(s):

    Join the faculty from the Ohio State University’s Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Developmental Economics and Ohio State University Extension as they discuss the issues and trends affecting agriculture in Ohio.  Each meeting is being hosted by a county OSU Extension office or agribusiness to provide a local personal contact for this meeting. A meal is provided with each meeting and included in the registration price. Questions can be directed to the local host contact.

    Dr. Matt Roberts will provide the grain outlook for 2016 and what farmers can expect in the coming years. The morning will also feature a presentation from Barry Ward on examining land values, cash rents, input costs and potential crop profitability for the coming year. Additionally, Dr. Ian Sheldon will discuss the Trans-Pacific trade partnership and what it might mean for U.S. agriculture.

    A schedule of meetings around the state, including location details, can be found at: http://aede.osu.edu/research/agricultural-policy-and-outlook-conferences...

Crop Observation and Recommendation Network

C.O.R.N. Newsletter is a summary of crop observations, related information, and appropriate recommendations for Ohio crop producers and industry. C.O.R.N. Newsletter is produced by the Ohio State University Extension Agronomy Team, state specialists at The Ohio State University and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC). C.O.R.N. Newsletter questions are directed to Extension and OARDC state specialists and associates at Ohio State.

Contributors

Andy Michel (State Specialist, Entomology)
Anne Dorrance (State Specialist, Soybean Diseases)
Bruce Clevenger, CCA (Field Specialist, Farm Management)
Glen Arnold, CCA (Field Specialist, Manure Nutrient Management )
Greg LaBarge, CPAg/CCA (Field Specialist, Agronomic Systems)
Jason Hartschuh, CCA (Field Specialist, Dairy & Precision Livestock)
Les Ober, CCA (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Mark Badertscher (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Mike Estadt (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Mike Gastier, CCA (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Nathan Douridas, CCA (Farm Science Review Farm Manager)
Peter Thomison (State Specialist, Corn Production)
Pierce Paul (State Specialist, Corn and Wheat Diseases)
Sam Custer (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)

Disclaimer

The information presented here, along with any trade names used, is supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement is made by Ohio State University Extension is implied. Although every attempt is made to produce information that is complete, timely, and accurate, the pesticide user bears responsibility of consulting the pesticide label and adhering to those directions.

CFAES provides research and related educational programs to clientele on a nondiscriminatory basis. For more information, visit cfaesdiversity.osu.edu. For an accessible format of this publication, visit cfaes.osu.edu/accessibility.