CFAES Give Today
Agronomic Crops Network

Ohio State University Extension

CFAES

C.O.R.N. Newsletter: 2017-04

  1. Steps to keep Palmer amaranth out of your operation

    Author(s): Mark Loux

    As of the end of 2016, Palmer amaranth had been found in 18 Ohio counties, and the majority of it is resistant to both glyphosate and ALS-inhibiting herbicides (site 2) based on OSU greenhouse screening.  Not all of these “finds” represent problem infestations, and in some cases the potential for a few plants to become an established patch was remedied by timely removal and subsequent monitoring.  There are however a number of fields where Palmer became well established and effective control has since required extremely comprehensive herbicide programs combined with removal be hand.  This past growing season, three soybean fields were so densely infested with Palmer that they had to be mowed down in early August.  At that point, the only recommendation we could make was mowing, to prevent the production of massive amounts of additional seed, in order to at least limit somewhat how bad future infestations were going to be (photos of this on our blog – u.osu.edu/osuweeds).  These infestations obviously started prior to this year, and were ignored, allowing them to continue to increase to the point of disaster.  This scenario is of course what occurred in many fields in the southern US as Palmer spread and took over fields.  In this article we cover the relative importance of the various paths of Palmer amaranth introduction in to Ohio fields so far, and the steps growers can take to prevent infestations from becoming established.

    1.  Use cotton feed products from the south by animal operations, and subsequent spread of manure from these operations onto crop fields, has been responsible for most of the infestations in Ohio so far.  Palmer is widespread in cotton fields in the south so the cotton harvest byproducts that are shipped to Ohio for use as feed have a high potential to contain Palmer seed.

    Action items:  a) avoid use of these feed products, b) educate animal operations in your area about this issue; c) if still using these feed products, find out whether the supplier has taken any steps to remove Palmer seed prior to shipping them here; d) if possible, store manure in pits for a period of time prior to spreading, which may reduce the seed viability at least somewhat. 

    2.  Field to field spread by local equipment has occurred in a few areas of the state, primarily via combines that are used in Palmer-infested fields without subsequent complete cleanout (and it’s impossible to get all Palmer seed out of a combine anyway). 

    Action items:  a) if hiring custom harvesters, find out whether the combine has previously been in fields infested with Palmer; b) ask the custom harvest operator what his philosophy is with regard to harvesting very weedy fields or those infested with Palmer - does he avoid these fields, are cleanout procedures used? 

    3.  Purchase of used equipment that came from the south is known to be the source of several infestations in one area of the state.  In this case a used combine was purchased from a local equipment dealer, but apparently originated in Georgia.

    Action items:  a) when purchasing used equipment, especially combines, know the full history; and b) avoid purchase of combines from Palmer-infested areas.

    4.  Contamination of seed used for establishment of cover crops, CREP and similar areas, pollinator areas, wildlife areas, etc.  We should say at the outset here that as far as we know this has been the source of only two infestations of Palmer amaranth in Ohio – one in Scioto County that may have started in about 2007, and one in Madison County several years ago that was torn up to prevent future problems and so did not turn into an established infestation.  However, a pollinator seeding program in Iowa this year resulted in many new introductions of Palmer amaranth due to the contamination of pollinator seed with Palmer seed.  (A recent Ohio Farmer article on this subject made it look like Armageddon was about to occur here in Ohio based on the problems that occurred farther west, which is an overstatement.  It stated that two counties were “infected” with Palmer due to contamination of CREP, when the reality is that there are three infested fields in Scioto County.  The introduction in Madison County was largely eradicated). 

    Much of this type of seed is produced farther west (Kansas, Texas, etc), or

    in the south in the case of warm-season grasses, in areas that can be abundantly infested with Palmer amaranth.  Palmer amaranth is not a noxious weed in the western states at least.  The Catch 22 is that while seed sold for use here is not supposed to contain seed of Palmer amaranth or other weeds designated as noxious in Ohio, the fact that Palmer is not a noxious weed where the seed is produced means that the seed tag does not have to show whether Palmer seed is a contaminant.  If you are thinking well that doesn’t make any sense, you’re not alone.  Programs of state and federal agencies have been relying on seed tags for the most part, although they are encouraging growers to have seed tested (see below).  One county FSA office apparently does mandate testing of all seed.  Pheasants Forever appears to have a more proactive approach in place.  They contract with only one seed vendor each year.  Prior to being shipped from the Kansas vendor, seed is screened for the presence of first any pigweed, and then also Palmer amaranth if necessary. 

    Action items:  a) Ohio Department of Agriculture (ODA) will screen any seed of this type for the presence of all Ohio noxious weeds.  We recommend having this done prior to planting.  Contact the ODA Grain, Feed, and Seed Program at (614) 728-6410 – they have to pick the seed up, it cannot be mailed or dropped off.

    Other possible mechanisms of introduction include movement of seed on animals or migratory birds or with flood water, all of which are out of one’s control.  Keep in mind that the residual herbicides we are using to control marestail and ragweeds also have activity on Palmer amaranth.  The early-season control of Palmer that they provide allows for a fighting chance to scout and remove Palmer plants later in the season, before they have been able to produce viable seed.  There was no use of residual herbicide in the fields that were mowed down this year (nothing except glyphosate actually). 

    We need to have a zero tolerance attitude toward Palmer amaranth in Ohio.  An important component of this, in addition to the steps outlined above, is scouting of soybean fields in mid to late season for the presence of Palmer plants that have escaped all prior herbicide treatments.  This can be accomplished a number of ways – driving by or around fields and scanning with binoculars, use of a drone, etc.  Any Palmer plants found should be first checked for presence of mature seed – small black seed upon shaking or crushing of seedheads.  If there are none, cut the plants off just below the soil line, remove from field and burn or compost.  They can reroot and gegrow enough to still produce seed if left in the field.  Where plants have mature seed, our suggestion would be to first cut off and bag seedheads on site, prior to removal of plants.  Or possibly drive into the field, and put them gently into the bed of a vehicle.  Avoid dragging plants with mature seed through the field.  We assume that Palmer plants would not be evident in corn fields until seen from a combine cab during harvest.  When in doubt, get help with identification and avoid contaminating combines with Palmer seed, rather than just harvesting through anything and hoping for the best.  Contact us at any time for help with identification or management advice.  There are also resources on the OSU weed management website – u.osu.edu/osuweeds.

     

  2. Xtend soybean/dicamba information

    Author(s): Mark Loux

    The latest blog post on the OSU weed management website, u.osu.edu/osuweeds, has information on XtendiMax and Engenia.  This includes primary labels and soybean supplemental labels for both products, along with an ODA fact sheet summarizing key aspects and differences between the labels.  We have also posted an OSU Powerpoint that summarizes some of the key stewardship information from labels.  BASF and Monsanto have started to provide approved tank-mix components on their websites - www.xtendimaxapplicationrequirements.com and www.engeniatankmix.com.  Reminder that anything that will be mixed with Engenia or XtendiMax – herbicides, adjuvants, etc – must be listed on these websites prior to use.  The same goes for nozzles, and approvals for these are starting to appear on the websites as well

  3. Don’t Get in a Hurry to Apply Nitrogen to Wheat

    Normally we would be concerned about producers applying nitrogen to wheat on frozen ground this time of year. The recent wave of abnormally warm temperatures has removed any frost that was in the ground and suggests that green-up may come sooner than recent years.

    Even if wheat comes out of winter earlier, the crop still does not require large amounts of N until stem elongation/jointing (Feekes Growth Stage 6), which is generally the middle or the end of April depending on the location in the state and spring temperatures. Ohio research has shown no yield benefit from applications made prior to this time period. Soil organic matter and/or N applied at planting generally provide sufficient N for early growth until stem elongation.

    Nitrogen applied prior to rapid utilization has the potential to be lost and unavailable for the crop. Nitrogen source will also affect the potential for loss. Urea-ammonium nitrate (28%) has the greatest potential for loss, ammonium sulfate the least, and urea would be somewhere between the two other sources.

    Ohio research has shown that yield losses may occur from N applied prior to green-up regardless of the N source. The level of loss depends on the year (losses would be smaller if the ground is not frozen or snow/ice covered). This same research did not observe a yield increase from applications made prior to green-up compared to green-up or Feekes Growth Stage 6 applications.  Keep in mind that green-up is a descriptive, relative term and not a definable growth stage. Our definition of green-up is when the new growth of spring has covered the dead tissue from winter giving the field a solid green color – thus, growing plants.

    There is a legitimate concern that wet weather may prevent application of N at early stem elongation. Ohio research has shown a yield decrease may occur when N application is delayed until Feekes Growth Stage 9 (flag leaf fully emerged). Thus a practical compromise is to topdress N any time fields are suitable for application after initial green-up to early stem elongation. There is still a potential for loss even at green-up applications. To lessen this risk a producer may want to use a N source that has a lower potential for loss such as urea or ammonium sulfate. ESN (polymer-coated urea) would be another option but it needs to be blended with urea or ammonium sulfate to insure enough N will be available for the crop between Feekes GS 6 – 9. The source of N becomes less important as the application date approaches stem elongation. The percentage of urea and/or ammonium sulfate would need to be increased with ESN for application times closer to Feekes GS 6. A producer may want to consider the use of a urease inhibitor with urea if conditions are favorable for volatilization losses: warming temperatures, drying winds and no rain in the forecast for 48 hours.

    A split application of N may also be used to spread the risk of N loss and to improve N efficiency; however, Ohio State University research has not shown a yield increase from this practice compared to a single application after green-up. In a split system, the first application should be applied no sooner than green-up. A smaller rate should be applied with the first application since little is needed by the crop at that time and the larger rate applied closer to Feekes GS 6.

    In summary, a producer may get away with applying N prior to green-up on wheat. However university data has not shown a yield advantage for these early applications, but results have shown in certain years a major N loss and yield reduction from applications prior to green-up. Why take the risk, just wait until green-up; the wheat does not need most of the N until April and May anyway.

  4. 2017 On-Farm Fertilizer Trials for Corn, Soybean, and Wheat

    Ohio State is looking for farmer cooperators and crop consultants to help conduct on-farm field trials for the 2017 field season. The 2017 field season will likely be our last year of field trials before Ohio fertilizer recommendations are updated and/or revised. We are looking specifically at N, P, K and S in corn, soybean and wheat. We are collecting data from a large number of farms across the state to determine fertilization rates that maximize farmer profitability. These trials should be considered an opportunity to learn more about your farm’s fertility needs, but also contribute to a state-wide effort for better nutrient management and water quality outcomes.

    We can work either directly with farmers, or contract crop consultants and agronomists to conduct the trials and collect data on farmers’ fields. Farmers can choose which nutrient they’d like to work with and will have a large degree of flexibility in the plot layout and applied rates. We have funds to compensate both farmers and crop consultants for their time and effort.

    Here is a ranking of priorities for trials in 2017.

    • Top Priority

        o   P and K in corn, soybean or wheat. We are especially interested in fields that test low in P and K

    • Second Priority
      • Sulfur in corn, soybean or wheat
      • Starter P in corn
    • Third Priority
    •    Late season N in corn
    •    N rate trial in corn and wheat

    For more information, please see go.osu.edu/fert-trial-2017 or contact Steve Culman at culman.2@osu.edu or (330) 822-3787.

    If you are interested in enrolling please go to: go.osu.edu/fert-trial-signup

  5. What’s Limiting Soybean Yield in Ohio?

    Author(s): Laura Lindsey

    2013, 2014, and 2015, with funding from Ohio Soybean Council and help from county extension educators, we measured soybean yield limiting factors on 199 farms across the state. Data collected included management practices (i.e., crop rotation, variety, row width, etc), soil fertility status, soybean cyst nematode (SCN) egg counts, and soybean yield. These were the top yield-reducers in our research:

    1.)   Planting Date: On average, soybean fields planted before May 16 were associated with yields 4 bu/acre greater compared to fields planted on or after May 16. The greatest benefit of planting during the first half of May is early canopy closure which increases light interception, improves weed control by shading out weeds, and helps retain soil moisture. However, make sure soil temperature is at least 50°F at planting. Planting before field conditions are adequate comes with the risk of damping-off, bean leaf beetle, and late spring freeze damage. 

    2.)    Soil fertility: A grain yield reduction of 7 bu/acre was associated with soil phosphorus levels less than the state established critical level while a grain yield reduction of 4 bu/acre was associated with potassium levels less than the state established critical level. However, there was no yield benefit to having soil phosphorus and potassium levels above the state established critical levels (i.e., If you’re field is not below the soil phosphorus and potassium critical level, you’re very unlikely to see a yield increase with additional fertilizer applications.)

    3.)   Soybean cyst nematode: Fields with over 200 eggs/100 cc of soil were associated with yields that were 6 bu/acre lower compared to fields with less than 200 eggs/100 cc soil. With as few as 1,600 eggs/100 cc soil, yield losses of 25% have been reported in Ohio. In our research, 80% of the fields sampled had detectable levels of soybean cyst nematode. Furthermore, many of the participants were unaware of any soybean cyst nematode problems in their field. (Often times, soybean cyst nematode infection causes no visible above-ground symptoms.) If you’ve never tested your fields for soybean cyst nematode, we suggest doing so.

    There are many other factors that can influence soybean yield, so our soybean yield limitation research is on-going with funding from the North Central Soybean Research Program. If you are interested in participating, see our online survey tool at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ohiosoybean.

  6. Last Chance to Register for PlanterU: Be Prepared for Spring Planting

    Author(s): John Fulton

    Planting remains a crucial field operation establishing maximum yield potential.  Mistakes or poor planter performance can reduce yield potential.  Variables such as seed spacing, seeding depth and optimizing seedbed preparation for proper soil-to-seed contact are important to achieving potential yields.  Proper planter maintenance and setup are fundamental to get ready for spring planting.  Purdue University research indicated that a 2bu/ac decrease in corn yield for every inch in standard deviation of seed spacing, plus there can be yield loss with poor emergence and non-even stands.  With tight margins and high seed costs, one cannot afford to get seeds placed improperly.

     

    Want to hear from the experts? Plan to attend Planter University, February 28th at the Beck’s PFR site near London, Ohio.  Great lineup of university and industry speakers presenting on a variety topics focused on planting.   $50 registration (http://go.osu.edu/PlanterU) includes breakfast, lunch, and CCA credits.

    Topics include planter setups, meter performance, downforce technology, ground engaging attachments, compaction, new technology to monitor planter performance, starter fertilizer, UAVs and much more, all with focus on improving seed placement and emergence.

    ·        Planter Setup for Maximizing Yield Potential, Bill Lehmkuhl, Precision Agri Services

    ·        UAVs & Imagery for Planting Evaluations, Jim Love, Beck’s Hybrids

    ·        Meter, Downforce and other Technologies, Dustin Christofferson, South Dakota Wheat Growers

    ·        Seed and Nutrient Placement to Maximize Profit, Doug Wiegand, Precision Planting

    ·        Rapid-Fire Breakout Sessions

    o   Compaction / Tracks - Dr. Scott Shearer, Ohio State University

    o   Fertilizer Placement at Planting - Ryan McAllister, Beck's Hybrids

    o   Electronic Drive Technology – Dr. Matt Darr, Iowa State University

    o   Data Needs for Supporting Planting Decisions - Dave Scheiderer, Integrated Ag

    ·        Panel Discussion facilitated by Dr. Randy Taylor of Oklahoma State University with comments on the “Future of Planting Technology"

     

    Register at http://go.osu.edu/PlanterU or call Champaign County Extension at 937-484-1526.  Great opportunity to gain valuable insight before heading to the field

Crop Observation and Recommendation Network

C.O.R.N. Newsletter is a summary of crop observations, related information, and appropriate recommendations for Ohio crop producers and industry. C.O.R.N. Newsletter is produced by the Ohio State University Extension Agronomy Team, state specialists at The Ohio State University and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC). C.O.R.N. Newsletter questions are directed to Extension and OARDC state specialists and associates at Ohio State.

Contributors

Anne Dorrance (State Specialist, Soybean Diseases)
Ed Lentz, CCA (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Elizabeth Hawkins (Field Specialist, Agronomic Systems)
Glen Arnold, CCA (Field Specialist, Manure Nutrient Management )
Greg LaBarge, CPAg/CCA (Field Specialist, Agronomic Systems)
Jason Hartschuh, CCA (Field Specialist, Dairy & Precision Livestock)
Lee Beers, CCA (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Mark Badertscher (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Mike Estadt (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Pierce Paul (State Specialist, Corn and Wheat Diseases)
Steve Culman (State Specialist, Soil Fertility)
Ted Wiseman (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Wayne Dellinger, CCA (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)

Disclaimer

The information presented here, along with any trade names used, is supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement is made by Ohio State University Extension is implied. Although every attempt is made to produce information that is complete, timely, and accurate, the pesticide user bears responsibility of consulting the pesticide label and adhering to those directions.

CFAES provides research and related educational programs to clientele on a nondiscriminatory basis. For more information, visit cfaesdiversity.osu.edu. For an accessible format of this publication, visit cfaes.osu.edu/accessibility.