C.O.R.N. Newsletter: 2022-14
Breadcrumb Menu
-
CFAES Ag Weather System 2022 Near-Surface Air and Soil Temperatures/Moisture (Update 7 - Final)
Author(s): Aaron Wilson, Greg LaBarge, CPAg/CCA
Figure 1: Daily average air temperature (dashed red), two-inch (green) and four-inch (blue) soil temperatures for spring 2022. Current daily average soil temperatures are noted for each location. Soil type and location of measurements (under sod or bare soil) are provided in the lower right corner of each panel. A map of all locations is in the bottom right. Data provided by the College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences (CFAES) Agricultural Research Stations located throughout the state.
The weather finally took a big turn toward warmer and drier conditions across the Buckeye State last week. Most locations throughout Ohio had daytime highs in the low to mid 80s on 5 or 6 days. This allowed soil temperatures rise about 15°F, ending the week in the mid to upper 60s. Though a cool down is underway early this week, air temperatures are expected to remain mild enough to keep soil temperatures averages in the 60s this week. This is the final soil temperature update for the season.

Figure 2: (Left) Total precipitation for the week ending May 16, 2022, according to the CoCoRaHS observing network. (Right) Soil moisture percentiles as of 05/15/2022 according to the Climate Prediction Center.
Along with the warm temperatures, dry conditions prevailed most of the week. Scattered, slow moving thunderstorms brought locally heavy rain to the region on Saturday. Fayette, Putnam, and Fulton County sites reported more than two inches. Another line of showers and storms moved across the state Sunday night into Monday morning, with most locations across Ohio picking up between 0.5-2” over the last 7 days (Fig. 2 -left).
Ohio Crop Progress Report (https://go.osu.edu/cropprogress) is the place for current updates on planting progress. Our earliest planting date corn was around 4/23/2022. These fields should be emerged regardless of you location in the state. Germination progress is soil temperature and moisture-related. The temperature relationship is reasonably predictable for corn, requiring 100 to 120 growing degree days (GDDs) to emerge. We refer you to a 2021 CORN for more on calendar vs. GDD for corn emergence at https://go.osu.edu/cornemergence. Table 1 below shows accumulated GDD at CFAES weather stations since April 23rd, when fieldwork broadly began across the state. 2-inch soil temperatures from the CFAES network are used to generate GDD. Based on the earliest planting dates we should be seeing corn emergence in the southern part of the state.
Table 1. GDD Accumulation at CFAES weather Stations based on 2-inch soil temperatures since April 23rd
CFAES Weather Station
GDD 2-in Soil
April 23 to May 15
Emergence of Corn Planted 4/23 (Yes or No)
Corn emergence would be expected for planting dates before
1-Ashtabula
188
Yes
5/8/2022
2-Northwest
170
Yes
5/8/2022
3-North Central
173
Yes
5/5/2022
4-Wooster
160
Yes
5/3/2022
5-Western
256
Yes
5/9/2022
6-Eastern
252
Yes
5/7/2022
7-Piketon
276
Yes
5/9/2022
For more complete weather records for CFAES research stations, including temperature, precipitation, growing degree days, and other useful weather observations, please visit https://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/weather1/.
-
Alfalfa is Ready to Harvest in Ohio
Author(s): , Bruce Clevenger, CCA, Dean Kreager, Osler Ortez, Les Ober, CCA, Richard Purdin, Mark SulcOhio’s spring had a cold start but has rapidly turned the corner to persist warmer temperatures. Many of Ohio’s pure alfalfa stands are ready to be harvested for high-quality feed. As alfalfa field observations are being made across the state, educators are noticing in more southern regions alfalfa stage seems to be further behind than usual with current height measurements. Meaning, this year if producers were to make a harvest decision based on alfalfa maturity, %NDF would be higher than what is expected. Thus, using PEAQ to estimate %NDF quickly is such a valuable tool for alfalfa producers.
Some dairy producers took advantage of the warm dry weather this past weekend to harvest a few pure alfalfa stands. As more rain is expected across the state this week, be mindful of harvesting in wet conditions. Harvesting when the soil is too wet and soft will do non-reversible compaction damage to the stand and will lower the productivity the rest of this year and into future years.
If producers need more guidance on forage quality targets for certain animal classes, there was a great article written last week which can be referred to here.
The following table indicates average stage, height, and %NDF values over the last week across Ohio.
Date
Location (County)
Average Height
Stage
Average %NDF
5/12/22
Adams
26.4
Bud
36.1
5/13/22
Clark
26.4
Bud
35.5
5/16/22
Defiance
26
Bud
36.6
5/15/22
Licking
27
Bud
34.5
5/16/22
Putnam
25
Bud
35.9
5/16/22
Stark
N/A
N/A
Harvested
5/15/22
Wayne
24.3
Bud
35.5
-
Forage Harvest Management to Speed Drying and Store High Quality Forage
First cutting should be taken very soon to achieve high quality forage, as seen by some of the estimated NDF levels in standing alfalfa crops around the state. Keep in mind that for dairy quality hay, alfalfa should be stored near 40% NDF and grass hay crops should have less than 55% NDF, which happens in the boot stage, or before the first flowering heads begin to emerge. Keep in mind also that the cutting, drying, and storing process results in raising NDF levels at least 3 NDF units above what it was in the standing crop at the time of cutting, and that assumes quick drying and ideal harvesting procedures.
So, it is time to be thinking about that first cutting and looking for weather windows of opportunity, especially along I-70 and south. Cutting forage for haylage or dry hay is certainly a gamble but waiting for the perfect stretch of weather can end up costing us through large reductions in forage quality as the crop matures and the fiber becomes less digestible.
Before cutting though, keep in mind that the soil should be firm enough to support equipment. Compaction damage has long-lasting effects on forage crops. We’ve seen many fields where stand loss in wheel tracks led to lower forage yields, weed invasion, and frustrating attempts to “fill in” the stand later.
Before cutting also keep in mind any harvest intervals required for any pesticides applied. We know some growers around the state have applied insecticides for alfalfa weevil control, so any pre-harvest intervals on the insecticide label have to be followed in order to feed the forage after harvesting.
This article summarizes proven techniques that can help speed up the process involved in storing good quality forage. While the weather limits how far we can push the limits, these techniques can help us improve the chances of success in those short windows of opportunity between rains, and hopefully avoid overly mature stored forages.
Haylage vs. hay.
Consider making haylage/silage or baleage instead of dry hay. Haylage is preserved at higher moisture contents, so it is a lot quicker to get it to a proper dry matter content for safe preservation compared with dry hay. Proper dry matter content for chopping haylage or wrapping baleage can often be achieved within 24 hours or less compared with 3 to 5 days for dry hay.
“Hay in a day” is possible when making hay crop silage, under excellent drying conditions, which is less probably in spring than mid-summer. The forage is mowed first thing in the morning and laid in wide swaths to be raked in the late afternoon and chopped as haylage starting in early evening. Proper dry matter content for haylage ranges from 30 to 50% (50 to 70% moisture) depending on the structure used.
Wrapped baleage usually requires 24 hours to cure. Wrapped baleage should be dried to 40 to 55% dry matter (45 to 60% moisture).
Dry hay should be baled at 80 to 85% dry matter (15 to 20% moisture), depending on the size of the bale package. The larger and the denser the dry hay package, the drier it must be to avoid spoilage. For example, safe baling moistures for dry hay without preservatives are 18-20% for small square bales (80 to 82% dry matter), 18% or less for large round bales, and less than 17% for large square bales. See below for more information on baling with preservatives.
Mechanically condition the forage.
Faster drying of cut forage begins with using a well-adjusted mower-conditioner to cause crimping/cracking of the stem (roller conditioners) or abrasion to the stems (impeller conditioners). Adjust roller conditioners so at least 90% of the stems are either cracked or crimped (roller conditioners) or show some mechanical abrasion (impeller conditioners).
Some excellent guidelines for adjusting these mower conditioners can be found in an article by Dr. Ronald Schuler of the University of Wisconsin, available online at https://fyi.extension.wisc.edu/forage/adjusting-the-conditioning-system-....
Consider desiccants.
Desiccants are chemicals applied when mowing the crop that increase the drying rate. The most effective desiccants contain potassium carbonate or sodium carbonate. They are more effective on legumes than grasses and most useful for making hay rather than silage or baleage. Desiccants work best under good drying conditions. They do not help increase drying rate when conditions are humid, damp, and cloudy, such as we can often experience in the spring. Consider the weather conditions before applying them.
Maximize exposure to sunlight.
I once heard someone say "You can’t dry your laundry in a pile, so why do you expect to dry hay that way?"
Exposure to the sun is the single most important weather factor to speed drying. Expose to sunshine as much of the cut forage as possible.
The swath width should be about 70% of the actual cut area. The current mowers on the market vary in how wide a windrow they can make, but even those that make narrow windrows have been modified to spread the windrow wider. Details can be found in articles at the Univ. of Wisconsin website mentioned above (see especially “Getting the Most from the Mower Conditioner” by Kevin Shinners, https://fyi.extension.wisc.edu/forage/getting-the-most-from-the-mower-conditioner/).
Another way to spread out and aerate the crop for faster drying is with a tedder. Tedders are especially effective with grass crops. They can cause excessive leaf loss in legumes if used when the leaves are dry. Tedders can be a good option when the ground is damp, because the crop can be mowed into narrow windrows to allow more ground exposure to sunlight for a short time, and then once the soil has dried for a few hours to a day, the crop can be spread out with the tedder. Tedding twice may decrease drying time. Tedding shortly after mowing allows 100% ground coverage, then tedding the next day helps keep the crop off the ground. Be cautious to set the tedder properly so that dirt is not incorporated into the hay but all hay is lifted off the ground.
Take precautions to follow manufacturer recommendations on ground speed and RPM’s when tedding. Many of the modern in-line “fluffer” type tedders are ground driven and operators often exceed recommended speeds, which can result in bunching and wrapping of the hay, which will increase drying time and make raking more difficult.
When making haylage, if drying conditions are good, rake multiple wide swaths into a windrow just before chopping. For hay, if drying conditions are good, merge or rake multiple wide swaths into a windrow the next morning when the forage is 40 to 60% moisture to avoid excessive leaf loss.
Research studies and experience have proven that drying forage in wide swaths can significantly speed up drying. Faster drying in wide swaths results in less chance of rain damage and studies by the University of Wisconsin showed that wide swaths (72% of the cut width) result in lower neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and higher energy in the stored forage.
Consider preservatives.
Sometimes the rain just comes quicker than we have time for making dry hay. As mentioned above, making haylage helps us preserve good quality forage in those short rain-free windows. A second option is to use a preservative. The most effective preservatives are based on proprionic acid, which is caustic to equipment, but many buffered proprionic preservatives are available that minimize that problem.
Preservatives inhibit mold growth and allow safe baling at moisture contents a little higher than the normal range for dry hay. Carefully follow the preservative manufacturer’s directions and application rates for the hay moisture content at baling. Be sure the application is uniform to avoid spots that spoil. Most products are effective when hay moisture is less than 25% but become less dependable between 25-30% moisture and do not work if hay moisture is over 30%. When utilizing preservatives, safe baling moisture can go up to 26% on small squares and round bales, but only 23% on large squares, according to label guidelines on most proprionic acid-based products. Baling at these moistures requires properly calibrated equipment to apply the correct amounts of preservative, and it does not guarantee that bales will not generate internal heat.
While the acid works to limit the production of mold and fungal spores that can lead to additional heating, any type of bale made over 20% moisture always has the potential to heat. Although mold production may be limited, discoloration and carmelization of the higher moisture stems can still occur. This heating can also degrade proteins in the hay, reducing overall feed quality despite still helping to preserving the hay from spoilage and hopefully making it safe to store indoors. Keep in mind that preservative treated hay should be fed within a year or less, as the preservative effect will wear off over time.
If baling on the wet side, watch those bales carefully! If hay is baled at higher moisture contents that are pushing the safe limits, keep a close watch on them for two to three weeks. Use a hay temperature probe and monitor the internal temperature of the hay during the first three weeks after baling. See the following article for more information on monitoring wet hay: https://agcrops.osu.edu/newsletter/corn-newsletter/15-2021/hay-barn-fires-are-real-hazard
We hope you have a successful and safe forage harvesting season this spring and throughout the growing season.
-
Cooler (not cold) and Active Weather Week Ahead
Author(s): Aaron WilsonSummary
Climatologically, the monthly average temperature for April 2022 in Ohio was near the long-term mean, ranked as the 51st coolest April on record (1895-2022) and 42nd driest.
More recently, temperatures through the first half of May are running 1-5°F above the long-term mean (Fig. 1). This is largely the result of the 5- to 6-days last week spent in the low to mid 80s for highs. Overall, precipitation has been running greater than normal, except for a few counties near the Ohio River and in the far northeast. In fact, CoCoRaHS observations in Fayette County indicate that more than 9 inches of rain has fallen near Washington Court House over the last 30 days. For the latest up-to-date conditions, seasonal outlooks, and monthly climate summaries, please visit the State Climate Office of Ohio

Figure 1). Differences from average temperature for May 1-16, 2022. Figure courtesy of the Midwestern Regional Climate Center (https://mrcc.purdue.edu/).
Forecast
After a cool start on Tuesday morning, abundant sunshine should lift highs into the mid-60s across the Lake Erie shore to the upper 70s across southern counties. The next system moves in for Wednesday and Thursday, bringing scattered showers and storms and highs in the 70s. Strong southerly flow on Friday will bump temperatures well into the 80s, before a cold front moves through Ohio over the weekend enhancing the threat of showers and storms. The Weather Prediction Center is forecasting less than 0.50” across northeast Ohio to as much as 1.25” across the southwest over the next 7 days (Fig. 2).
Figure 2). Precipitation forecast from the Weather Prediction Center for 8pm Monday May 16 – 8pm Monday May 24.
The Climate Prediction Center’s 6–10-day outlook for the period of May 26 – 28, 2022 and the 16-Day Rainfall Outlook from NOAA/NWS/Ohio River Forecast Center lean toward below average temperatures and above average precipitation (Fig. 3). Climate averages for this period include a high temperature range of 72-76°F, a low temperature range of 50-55°F, and average weekly total precipitation of 0.85-1.15 inches.

Figure 3) Climate Prediction Center 6-10 Day Outlook valid for May 22-26, 2022, for left) temperatures and right) precipitation. Colors represent the probability of below, normal, or above normal conditions.
-
Lep Monitoring Network Update – Black Cutworm & True Armyworm
Author(s): Amy Raudenbush, Suranga Basnagala , Kyle Akred, Mark Badertscher, Lee Beers, CCA, Clifton Martin, CCA, James Morris, Eric Richer, CCA, Beth Scheckelhoff, Cindy Wallace, Curtis Young, CCA, Andy Michel, Kelley TilmonBlack cutworm
We are currently in our third week of monitoring for the black cutworm.
Traps were checked between May 9 – 15 for the presence of BCW adult moths. Over the past week, a total of 28 traps in 11 counties were monitored. Counties that reported an average of greater than 10 moths include Brown and Wood (Figure 1). Counties with high trap numbers should plan to monitor for BCW larvae after corn is planted, especially in fields with a lot of broadleaf weeds such broadleaf weeds, such as chickweed and purple dead nettle. For more information about BCW please visit: https://aginsects.osu.edu/sites/aginsects/files/imce/ENT_35_14%20BCW.pdf
Black cutworm moth report: May 9 - 15, 2022

Figure 1. Average black cutworm (BCW) moths captured from May 9th to May 15th. The large number indicates the average moth count for the week and the small number in parentheses is the total traps set up in the county.
True Armyworm
Trapping has begun for a second pest in the Lep Monitoring Network, the true armyworm (AMW) moth (Figure 2).
Wing traps were set the week of May 2nd and checked between May 9 – 15 for the presence of AMW adult moths. Over the past week, a total of 28 traps in 9 counties were monitored. Over the past week, trap numbers in Van Wert and Wood were above an average of 7 moths per trap (Figure 3).

Figure 2. True armyworm moth. Photo credit: Curtis Young.
True armyworm moth report: May 9 - 15, 2022

Figure 3. Average true armyworm moths captured from May 9th to May 15th. The large number indicates the average moth count for the week and the small number in parentheses is the total traps set up in the county.
-
Replanting Decisions in Corn and Soybeans… What to Consider
Early plantings, cold air and soil temperatures, precipitation, wind, and warmer temperatures during or after planting may lead to reduced stands in planted fields due to factors such as imbibitional chilling, frost damage, soil crusting, and standing water. These factors (or combinations of them) can negatively affect seedling vigor, plant growth, crop establishment, and plant stands. Reduced stands may result in lower yields. If reduced stands are a concern, a potential solution is to replant fields. However, before replanting, here is a list of steps to consider:
Step 1. Wait… Plant stand should be assessed after ‘stable’ and ‘better’ conditions are achieved (e.g., warmer temperatures, good moisture conditions). Often, hasty decisions are not the best.
- For corn, past work has shown that 50% emergence can be expected following accumulation of 150 soil GDDs (base of 50°F) from the time of planting, about 5-7 days under normal conditions.
- For soybean, assess the stand at the VC growth stage. Visual stand assessment at the VE growth stage often underestimates the total number of plants that will emerge.
Step 2. Estimate the number of plants per acre from several areas within the field by conducting stand counts. Remember, field variability exists, and collecting stand counts from several representative areas is important (Figure 1).

Figure 1. In-field plant emergence variability in corn. Left and right plants with more growth and development relative to the plant in the center. Source: Osler Ortez.
- For corn, after estimating the number of plants per acre, use Table 1 to locate the expected yield of the plant stand depending on the planting date. Then, locate the expected replant yield by reading across from the expected replanting date to the stand that would be replanted. The difference between these numbers is the percentage yield change (increase or decrease) expected from replanting.
Table 1. University of Illinois Replant Chart Developed Under High Yielding Conditions (adapted from Nafziger, 1995-96).
Plants per acre at harvest
Planting Date
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
% of optimum yield
April 10
62
76
83
92
94
93
April 20
67
81
91
97
99
97
April 30
68
82
92
98
100
98
May 9
65
79
89
95
97
96
May 19
59
73
84
89
91
89
May 29
49
62
73
79
81
79
- For soybean, replant is recommended only if the stand is less than 50,000 plants per acre. Although the stand will look poor, soybean plants can compensate for low plant populations by increasing the number of branches (Figure 2). In our research, going from 100,000 to 50,000 plants per acre resulted in only a 9 to 14% reduction in yield.

Figure 2. Soybean plants seeded at 100,000, 140,000, and 180,000 plants per acre. Source: Will Hamman.
Step 3. Check the weather forecast. How soon can you get back to the field to replant?
- For corn, early planting dates with lower stands can still produce good yields. From past research, a stand of 20,000 plants per acre planted on April 20 can still yield 91% of the optimum.
- For soybean, the date of planting has more effect on soybean grain yield than any other production practice. Yield loss resulting from delayed planting ranges from 0.25 to 1.0 bushel per acre per day. Replanting later may reduce yield more than having a low plant population.
-
Online Ohio Certified Crop Adviser Pre-Exam Course Now Available
Author(s): Lee Beers, CCAAre you interested in becoming a Certified Crop Adviser (CCA), but are intimidated by the exams? You should consider attending the Ohio CCA Pre-Exam Preparation Course offered by Ohio State University Extension. This online course will be available May 16 through September 30, 2022 and will allow you to study and progress at your own pace.
This course will provide an overview of the CCA program, and help you prepare for the test by covering basic principles in the four competency areas – nutrient management, soil and water management, pest management, and crop management. Even if you are not considering the CCA program, this class is a great basic agronomy course that any farmer, ag retailer, or anyone working with field crops will find valuable.
Cost for this course is $155/person and you can register for the course at the following link through OSU’s Scarlet Canvas: https://cfaesosu.catalog.instructure.com/courses/2022-certified-crop-adviser-exam-study-course-5867-2339
The Local and International Exams are proctored online tests. You must pass both exams to obtain Certified Crop Adviser status. The international exam is available on-demand, but the local exam is only available during the exam week of August 3 through August 10, 2022.. You can register for both exams here: https://www.certifiedcropadviser.org/exams/registration.
For more information about the CCA program, visit https://www.certifiedcropadviser.org/about-program
Course contact:
Greg LaBarge, CCA
Ohio State University Extension
Crop Observation and Recommendation Network
C.O.R.N. Newsletter is a summary of crop observations, related information, and appropriate recommendations for Ohio crop producers and industry. C.O.R.N. Newsletter is produced by the Ohio State University Extension Agronomy Team, state specialists at The Ohio State University and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC). C.O.R.N. Newsletter questions are directed to Extension and OARDC state specialists and associates at Ohio State.
Contributors
Disclaimer
The information presented here, along with any trade names used, is supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement is made by Ohio State University Extension is implied. Although every attempt is made to produce information that is complete, timely, and accurate, the pesticide user bears responsibility of consulting the pesticide label and adhering to those directions.
CFAES provides research and related educational programs to clientele on a nondiscriminatory basis. For an accessible format of this publication, visit cfaes.osu.edu/accessibility.