CFAES Give Today
Agronomic Crops Network

Ohio State University Extension

CFAES

C.O.R.N. Newsletter: 2023-24

  1. Battle for the Belt: Episode 20

    Episode 20 of Battle for the Belt is now available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46DQ3-Ub5rs&t=4s

    In Episode 20, we get a weather update from Aaron Wilson. (Aaron’s written update is included in a separate article of this week’s CORN newsletter.) We also talk with Luke Waltz, a PhD student in the Department of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering. Luke leads the remote sensing and soil sensor data collection aspects of the Battle for the Belt project. Sensors have been installed at all three Battle for the Belt locations in both the corn and soybean field areas. The soil sensors are from Meter Group and include Teros 12 (soil water content, electrical conductivity, and soil temperature), Teros 11 (soil water content and soil temperature), and Teros 21 (matric potential). Additional aboveground sensors include an Apogee SQ-521 photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) sensor and an ATMOS 14 weather sensor, collecting temperature and relative humidity in the canopy. The sensors plug into a solar-powered ZL6 logger which sends the data over a cellular connection to Meter’s Zentra cloud application. The three research locations (Northwest, Western, and Wooster) all have very different soil textures with respect to clay, silt, and sand content as well as different amounts of organic matter. We’re interested in using these soil and weather sensors to understand how different soil types and weather conditions can affect important crop inputs such as plant available water and ultimately yield.

    Figure 1. Pictured left, planting date one at the Western Research Station. Pictured right, planting date three at the Western Research Station. Both of these are early maturing hybrids at 100 and 107 day.Battle For the Belt Location Updates

    Every location progressed this past week with maximum air temperatures staying around 86°F (Table 1). Temperatures higher than 86°F slow down crop growth, especially if there is not much moisture. According to our growing degree days, three of our five planting dates at Western and Northwest are in reproductive stages.

    At the Wooster location, for corn, planting date one has started to silk, while planting date 2 is at V12/V13, planting date three at V14/15, planting date four at V9, and planting date five at V6. For soybeans the stages of planting date one, two, three, four, and five are as follows: R2, R2, R2, V11, and V3. At this location throughout the season planting date three has continued to have the best canopy coverage and uniformity.

    At the Western location, for corn, planting date one is fully pollinated and at R2. The silks are red and drying down. There was very low disease pressure during tassel and silking, so a fungicide application was not necessary. Planting date two, three, four, and five stages are R1, V16, V13, and V8. The soybeans stages for planting date one, two, three, four, and five are as follows: R4, R2, R2, R1, and V4. Planting date one is putting on pods, while planting date two, three, and four are all flowering. Planting date four has not fully canopied yet, however, vegetative growth does not stop during reproductive growth, so planting date four could still have a full canopy.

    Table 1. The planting date one, two, three, four and five in the trial at all three locations with day of planting, soil, air temperature averages, and Growing Degree Days (GDDS). Information from CFAES Weather System, https://weather.cfaes.osu.edu/.
    As a recap, this research project includes five planting date windows, 1) Ultra early = late March to early April; 2) Early = mid to late April; 3) Normal = early to mid-May; 4) Late = late May-first week of June; and 5) Very late = mid to late June. 

    Keep following the ‘Battle for the Belt’ this growing season to learn more and get further updates! You can  find the full video playlist of Battle for the Belt on the Ohio State Agronomy YouTube channel.

  2. Weather Update: Heatwave and Scattered Storms Expected

    Author(s): Aaron Wilson

    July has brought wetter conditions to some folks across Ohio. Most areas have received 2.5 to 4 inches of rain since July 1st, with pockets of over 6” (e.g., Clinton County). Still, plenty of counties are running below average for the month (Figure 1). Certainly, cooler than average temperatures since June 1st have helped mitigate impacts from dryness, and with recent wetter conditions, drought area for Ohio has fallen to ~13% as of Thursday July 20, 2023 (US Drought Monitor). The CFAES Rapid Response Team continues to manage the drought response resource site and encourage readers to continue to submit observations and impacts for your location by visiting https://go.osu.edu/drought_cmor.

    Figure 1: Percent of Normal precipitation for July 1 – 24, 2023. Figure courtesy of the Midwestern Regional Climate Center.

    Forecast
    This week will feature a warming trend and typical summertime unsettled weather across the region. Isolated showers and storms are possible at any time from Tuesday through Saturday, with a cold front sliding south across the region over the weekend. High temperatures will start out in the 80s for most of the state on Tuesday, warming into the low to mid 90s for Wednesday through Friday, and accompanied by higher humidity levels. The front will knock temperatures back into the 80s for the weekend. Rain will not occur everywhere, everyday, but locally heavy rain will be possible each day throughout this period. The current forecast shows 0.25-1.25 inches of rain is expected this week (Figure 2- locations of heaviest rain will likely deviate from this figure).

    Figure 2). Precipitation forecast from the Weather Prediction Center for 8pm Monday July 24  – 8pm Monday July 31, 2023.

    The Climate Prediction Center’s 8-14 Day Outlook and the 16-Day Rainfall Outlook from NOAA/NWS/Ohio River Forecast Center indicate that probabilities for temperatures are learning toward below average with near normal precipitation for the period of August 1 – 7, 2023 (Figure 3). We have reached our climatologically warmest conditions of the year, with an average high-temperature range of 84-87°F, a low-temperature range of 63-67°F, and average weekly total precipitation of 0.75-0.90 inch.

    Figure 3) Climate Prediction Center 8-14 Day Outlook valid for August 1 – 7, 2023, for left) temperatures and right) precipitation. Colors represent the probability of below, normal, or above normal conditions.

  3. Hail Damage to Soybean and Corn

     Licensed   FILE #:  447531852  Preview Crop  Find Similar DIMENSIONS 7456 x 4973px FILE TYPE JPEG CATEGORY Industry LICENSE TYPE Education License Detail of a corn field damaged by a hail storm

    While the damage was not widespread, there was severe hail damage reported in Preble County, Ohio, last week (Figure 1). Soybean plants were at approximately the R2 (full flower) growth stage. Corn was at late vegetative stages to early reproductive stages (R1). If you experience hail damage, be sure to talk to your crop insurance provider. Two conditions must be considered in hail damage: hail characteristics (e.g., hail size, number, speed) and the characteristics of the target (e.g., crop, stage, variety/hybrid), as some of the outcomes may be driven by these factors.

    Figure 1. Hail damage to soybean and corn from Preble County, Ohio. [Photos taken on Tuesday, July 18 by Allen Geyer.]

    Soybean. Hail damage to soybean plants may include defoliation, node loss, stand loss, and/or bruising. At the vegetative growth stages, yield loss due to defoliation is minimal; however, stem damage and node loss can reduce soybean yield. Soybean plants are most susceptible to hail damage and yield loss during the reproductive stages. The degree of yield loss can vary among soybean varieties (e.g., differences in leaf morphology and relative maturity) and subsequent weather after the damage was incurred. To assess soybean yield loss, the stand reduction, defoliation percentage, and nodes cut off/broken over percentage needs to be estimated from the field. After assessing the Preble County location, we estimate defoliation to be around 90% (Figure 1). (We also noted some hail damage in Clinton County, but to a much lesser extent with approximately 15% defoliation.) While the defoliation is not ideal, yield losses are less than one might expect as the soybean plants will continue to grow and put on new leaves. Data from the University of Wisconsin- Madison shows 33% yield loss with 100% defoliation when defoliation was at the R3 growth stage or earlier. At the Preble County location, in addition to defoliation, some of the stems were broken (node loss). Research at University of Wisconsin- Madison estimates a 15%, 24%, 37%, and 59% yield loss with 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% main-stem node removal, respectively. The University of Nebraska- Lincoln organized a soybean yield loss worksheet and charts to help calculate the soybean grain yield loss caused by hail damage and it can be found here: https://extensionpublications.unl.edu/assets/pdf/ec128.pdf.

    Corn. Hail damage in corn can lead to reduction of plant stands (early in the season, vegetative stages), leaf defoliation and stalk damage (mid-season, vegetative and reproductive stages), and damage to ears and stalks and grain quality (late in the season, reproductive stages). The stage of corn at the time of hail affects the level of damage to the crop. For example, hail damage to young plants (before the V5 stage) can be low since the growing point is at or below the soil surface and plant recovery is expected. However, during mid-season (about V10 stage to tasseling or silking) when corn nutrient, water, and dry weight accumulation increase, hail damage to corn can be more detrimental, depending on the percent of destroyed leaves. Usually, the larger the percentage of defoliation, the more significant the yield loss. Research on stand losses in Ohio reported that 17–50% stand loss at the 7-leaf stage resulted in 6–16% yield loss. Yield losses at the 10-leaf and 13-leaf growth stages were similar to the 7-leaf stage when stands were reduced by 17% and 33%. When plant stands were reduced 50%, yield losses were closer to 20%. At the 17-leaf growth stage, 50% stand reduction resulted in an overall grain yield reduction of 30%. This helps illustrate what yield loss may occur from reduced stands. On the other hand, other Ohio studies on leaf defoliation reported that defoliation at the 10-leaf stage or earlier may not dramatically affect grain yield. Loss of 50% to 100% of leaf area at the 10-leaf stage resulted in less than a 5% yield loss, but tassel deformation could occur (hybrid specific) after 100% defoliation. Loss of 50% of leaf area at the 15-leaf growth stage resulted in 12% yield loss, and 100% defoliation caused 35% yield loss. Defoliation during grain fill reduced grain yield by 23, 14, and 7% at blister (R2), milk (R3), and soft dough (R4) stages, respectively. Additional effects of hail damage in corn production can include more weed pressure (due to lower corn competition), tassel deformation, twisted leaf whorls, stalk rot and lodging, grain quality concerns, lower test weights, and grain moisture at harvest. If you were affected, keep an eye out for these issues.

    For both corn and soybean, if hail damage occurs, it is recommended that field inspections (e.g., assessments, adjustments) are delayed a minimum of 7 days for a more accurate assessment of the actual damage to stands, canopy, and crop recovery.

    References:
    Battaglia, M., Lee, C., Thomason, W., Fike, J., Sadeghpour, A. 2019. Hail Damage Impacts on Corn Productivity: A Review. Crop Science, 59: 1-14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2018.04.0285  

    Conley, S.P., Abendroth, L., Elmore, R., Christmas, E.P., Zarnstorff, M. 2008. Soybean seed yield and composition response to stand reduction at vegetative and reproductive stages. Agronomy Journal, 100, 1666-1669. Available at: https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2134/agronj2008.0082

    Conley, S.P., Pedersen, P., Christmas, E.P. 2009. Main-stem node removal effect on soybean seed yield and composition. Agronomy Journal, 101, 120-123. Available at: https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134/agronj2008.0123

    Klein, R.N., Shapiro, C.A. 2011. Evaluating hail damage to soybeans. University of Nebraska- Lincoln Extension, EC128. Available at: https://extensionpublications.unl.edu/assets/pdf/ec128.pdf

    Lindsey, A.J., Thomison, P.R. 2022. Corn Yield Response to Damage from Strong Storms. Ohioline, Ohio State University Extension, AC-1054 Factsheet. Available at: https://ohioline.osu.edu/factsheet/ac-1054    

  4. 2023 Ohio Wheat Performance Test- Results Available Online

    close up of wheat heads

    Results from the 2023 Ohio Wheat Performance Test are now online at:  2023 Ohio Wheat Performance Test. This year’s report includes 74 winter wheat varieties and 16 brands grown in five counties (Wood, Wayne, Darke, Union, and Pickaway) (Figure 1).

    In fall 2022, wheat was planted at four out of five locations within 14 days of the fly-free date. Fall growth was limited by lack of rainfall, but entered dormancy in good condition. Cool temperatures and adequate subsoil moisture led to a long grain fill period and very high-yielding conditions. However, grain moisture was higher and harvest dates were later than normal. Dry conditions in May resulted in lower-than-average disease incidence, and there was insufficient data at the disease nursery to provide Fusarium head blight, leaf blotch, and glume blotch ratings. Grain yield averaged between 83.1 and 125.6 bu/acre among the five locations.

    Figure 1. The 2023 Ohio Wheat Performance Test was conducted in five counties and included 74 winter wheat varieties.The purpose of the Ohio Wheat Performance Test is to evaluate wheat varieties, blends, brands, and breeding lines for yield, grain quality, and other important performance characteristics. This information gives wheat producers comparative information for selecting the varieties best suited for their production system and market. Varieties differ in yield potential, winter hardiness, maturity, standability, disease and insect resistance, and other agronomic characteristics. Selection should be based on performance from multiple test sites and years.

  5. Agriculture Technology Field Day

    Author(s): Alan Leininger

    The annual Agriculture Technology Conference will be held at Northwest State Community College in Archbold, Ohio on August 23, 2023, from 8:00am to 4:00pm. This year’s event will highlight planting and automation technology. The morning sessions will feature presentations on Systems Approach to Farmstead Automation for Grain Crop Production by Scott Shearer, Professor & Chair, Department of Food, Agriculture, & Biological Engineering Ohio State University, Broadband in Ohio and how it affects the agriculture industry by Peter Voderberg, Chief of BroadbandOhio, and Spray Drones What You Need to Know by Alan Leininger, ANR Educator Henry County, The Ohio State University.

    The afternoon will feature technology demonstrations from manufacturers such as John Deere, Case IH, Horsch, Pottinger and many more. Demonstrations on current UAS "Drone" spraying technology will also be featured. Several agribusinesses will be featured in our trade show area including the field demonstration companies.

    Certified Crop Advisors recertification credits will be available. You may register for the event at https://go.osu.edu/henryanr2023. If you would like more information, please contact the Henry County Extension Office at 419-592-0806 or email leininger.17@osu.edu.

    flyerflyer2

  6. Lep Monitoring Network Update #12 – High WBC Numbers – Time to Scout!

    The Ohio Lep Network is continuing to monitor moth pests across Ohio. As we have begun our 12th week of monitoring, we are continuing population reports for Western bean cutworm (WBC), corn earworm (CEW), and both variations of European corn borer (ECB - IA & NY).

    Although black cutworm (BCW) and true armyworm (AMW) monitoring for this season have both come to a close, it should be noted that Van Wert County, which had been seeing an increase in population numbers for several weeks after the typical peak, is continuing to see a climb in BCW numbers while AMW numbers are beginning to decline. This week Van Wert County reported an average of 11.2 BCW compared to the 7.2 average of last week, and an average of 4.6 AMW – a slight decrease compared to the 6.6 average reported last week.

    For more information on these pests and many more, check out our website: https://aginsects.osu.edu

    Watching the Western Bean Cutworm
    This is our fifth week reporting on adult Western bean cutworm (WBC) populations across Ohio. In total, 24 counties have been monitoring for WBC, using 78 total traps. The highest average reports for WBC come from Lucas County, with an average of 100 moths in 1 trap. Sandusky and Defiance counties also reported high averages of moths this past week (Figure 1).

    As mentioned in our most recent newsletter (#11), counties with an average of 7 or more WBC should continue scouting for WBC egg masses (Figure 2). Several counties across northern Ohio moving from west to east are seeing averages topping 7, so be sure to check your county average! The stark increase we have been seeing these past two weeks indicates that we are nearing the peak for WBC. For more information on how to scout for WBC and what to look for, see last week's newsletter: https://agcrops.osu.edu/newsletter/corn-newsletter/2023-23/lep-monitoring-network-update-11-%E2%80%93-time-scout-wbc

    Western Bean Cutworm Moth Map
    July 17th – 23rd, 2023

    Figure 1.  Average western bean cutworm moths (WBC) captured from July 17th – July 23rd. The bold number on the left indicates the average number of moths captured. The second number on the right indicates the number of traps monitored in each county.

    Figure 2. Western bean cutworm egg mass found on corn leaves. Pencil included for scale.

    Chasing the Corn Earworm
    This is our seventh week reporting on corn earworm (CEW) populations across Ohio. In total, 12 counties have been monitoring for CEW, using 21 total traps. The highest average reports for CEW come from Henry County, with an average of 4 moths (Figure 3). For more information on the corn earworm as well as the threats they pose, see our previous newsletter: https://agcrops.osu.edu/newsletter/corn-newsletter/2019-27/corn-earworm-field-corn-watch-molds

    Corn Earworm Moth Map
    July 17th – 23rd, 2023

    Figure 3. Average corn earworm moths (CEW) captured from 17th – July 23rd. The bold number on the left indicates the average number of moths captured. The second number on the right indicates the number of traps monitored in each county.

    Exploring the European Corn Borer
    This is our tenth week reporting on European corn borer (ECB – IA & NY) populations across Ohio. In total, 12 counties have been monitoring for ECB-IA, using 39 traps. The only county to report ECB presence this past week was Hardin County with an average of 0.5 moths (Figure 4). No moths were reported across all participating counties for the ECB-NY variant.

    For more detailed information about the European Corn Borer visit our previous article at: https://aginsects.osu.edu/sites/aginsects/files/imce/ENT_15_14.pdf

    European Corn Borer Moth Map
    July 17th – 23rd, 2023

     Figure 4. Average European corn borer moths (ECB) IA variant captured from July 17th – July 23rd. The bold number on the left indicates the average number of moths captured. The second number on the right indicates the number of traps monitored in each county. The NY variant had 0 moths recorded across all participating counties.

Crop Observation and Recommendation Network

C.O.R.N. Newsletter is a summary of crop observations, related information, and appropriate recommendations for Ohio crop producers and industry. C.O.R.N. Newsletter is produced by the Ohio State University Extension Agronomy Team, state specialists at The Ohio State University and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC). C.O.R.N. Newsletter questions are directed to Extension and OARDC state specialists and associates at Ohio State.

Contributors

Aaron Wilson (Field Specialist, Ag Weather & Climate State Climatologist of Ohio)
Alan Leininger (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Amber Emmons, CCA (Water Quality Extension Associate)
Andy Michel (State Specialist, Entomology)
Barry Ward (Program Leader)
Beth Scheckelhoff (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Brooks Warner (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Bruce Clevenger, CCA (Field Specialist, Farm Management)
Caden Buschur (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Chris Zoller (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Clint Schroeder (Program Manager)
Curtis Young, CCA (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Dean Kreager (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Don Hammersmith (Program Assistant, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Elizabeth Hawkins (Field Specialist, Agronomic Systems)
Glen Arnold, CCA (Field Specialist, Manure Nutrient Management )
Grant Davis, CCA (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Horacio Lopez-Nicora (State Specialist, Soybean Pathology)
Jason Hartschuh, CCA (Field Specialist, Dairy & Precision Livestock)
Jordan Penrose (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Kayla Wyse (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Ken Ford (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Kendall Lovejoy (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Kyle Verhoff (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Laura Lindsey (State Specialist, Soybean and Small Grains)
Lee Beers, CCA (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Les Ober, CCA (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Marina Miquilini (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Mark Badertscher (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Nic Baumer (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Nick Eckel (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Ricardo Ribeiro (Visiting Scholar, Federal University of Parana (Brazil))
Rob Leeds (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Ryan McMichael (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Sarah Noggle (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Ted Wiseman (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Trevor Corboy (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)

Disclaimer

The information presented here, along with any trade names used, is supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement is made by Ohio State University Extension is implied. Although every attempt is made to produce information that is complete, timely, and accurate, the pesticide user bears responsibility of consulting the pesticide label and adhering to those directions.

CFAES provides research and related educational programs to clientele on a nondiscriminatory basis. For an accessible format of this publication, visit cfaes.osu.edu/accessibility.