C.O.R.N. Newsletter: 2024-02
Breadcrumb Menu
-
Economics of Conservation Webinar Coming on January 31st
Author(s): Rachel Cochran Henry, CCA/CPAgHave you ever considered implementing conservation practices on your operation, but wanted to learn more about the economic side of doing so? Join OSU Extension on January 31st from 10:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. for the first Water Quality Wednesday Webinar of 2024: The Economics of Conservation.
Three speakers will provide an insight into the economic benefits of utilizing different conservation practices, including cover crops and the use of manure as a nutrient source. Katie Wilts Johnson, Extension Economist, Center for Farm Financial Management at the University of Minnesota, will use FINBIN data to discuss short and long-term cash flow positions and how this relates to utilizing cover crops. OSU Extension’s Farm Business Analysis Program Manager Clint Schroeder will discuss how OSU can help you figure out exactly how different management practices can benefit your farm economics. Glen Arnold, Field Specialist, Manure Nutrient Management at The Ohio State University will wrap up the session by discussing the yield and financial benefits of utilizing manure in-season as a nutrient source.
Certified Crop Adviser CEUs will be available during the live session. Register to receive the connection link at go.osu.edu/WQW24. Can’t join live? The recording of this webinar will be posted to the OSU Agronomy YouTube Channel’s Water Quality Playlist following the event. Questions can be directed to Rachel Cochran, cochran.474@osu.edu or (567) 344-5016.
Water Quality Wednesday Webinar Series Flyer
January 2024 Water Quality Wednesday: The Economics of Conservation
-
Certified Crop Adviser Exam Online Study Course
This online course will help those aspiring to become Certified Crop Advisers prepare for the program's required exams. The self-paced course covers fundamental crop production conceptions included in the local and International Certified Crop Adviser exam.
Key concepts in the program's four competency areas of nutrient management, soil & water management, pest management, and crop management are covered. The course includes video instruction, example quizzes, and resource materials. The highlighted resource materials include free items such as factsheets and guides and for-sale publications available for more in-depth study.
Course instructors are seasoned Certified Crop Advisers with OSU Extension. Amanda Douridas, Madison County Ag/NR Extension Educator; Stephanie Karhoff, Field Specialist Agronomic Systems; Lee Beers, Trumbull County Ag/NR Extension Educator; and Greg LaBarge, Field Specialist Agronomic Systems serve as instructors.
Registration for the course is open now through March 31, 2024. Enrollees have 24/7 access to course content through June 30, 2024. The registration fee is $155. To register and make the secure online payment, use the link: https://go.osu.edu/ccaonline.
Find general information about the CCA program at https://www.certifiedcropadviser.org/. Information on the Ohio program can be found at https://www.oaba.net/aws/OABA/pt/sp/cca.
-
Statewide and Region Phosphorus Nutrient Use in Ohio
Author(s): Greg LaBarge, CPAg/CCASoil available and added phosphorus (P) nutrient impacts Ohio's crop production and environment. Fertilizer P can increase crop yields. Yet, excessive P can have negative impacts on water quality, resulting in toxic algal blooms. To properly calibrate the use of P for maximum crop yield efficiency and environmental safety, it is important to monitor P use trends, understand the changes to P recommendations from 1995 to today, review changes in soil test phosphorus (STP), and identify the sources of P used. Two recent factsheets examine P nutrient use at two scales: statewide and regional. The regional results were summarized by Crop Reporting Districts (CRD), shown in Figure 1. The two publications and their links are Phosphorus (P) Nutrient Use in Ohio ANR-0143, found at https://go.osu.edu/ohiop, and Ohio Phosphorus (P) Use by Crop Reporting District ANR-0144, found at https://go.osu.edu/ohiocrdp.
These two reviews of P use reveal several trends impacting agronomic management and environmental outcomes:
- Ohio purchased P fertilizer use is trending downward (Figure 2). During the highest use period (1993–1997), 206,000 tons of P2O5 were applied annually. In the most recent period (2018–2022), annual applications averaged 137,000 tons. Agriculture reduced the average yearly P2O5 application by 33% between the two periods.
- All nine Ohio crop reporting districts (CRDs) show a declining trend in P2O5 usage from 1994 to 2022. The reduction rate ranges from 50 to 868 tons annually (Table 1).
-
Table 1. Annual change in trendline fertilizer usage by Crop Reporting District 1994-2022. Annual Change (tons P2O5)
R2
CRD10
-868
0.56
CRD20
-453
0.35
CRD30
-255
0.24
CRD40
-657
0.44
CRD50
-589
0.22
CRD60
-50
0.32
CRD70
-98
0.05
CRD80
-70
0.15
CRD90
-129
0.56
- Seven of nine Ohio CRDs show increased availability of P2O5 sourced from manure. CRD 30 and 80 show a decline. The 2017–2022 average annual increase in manure P2O5 is 28 to 355 tons for the seven districts with an increase.
- Sixty-five percent of Ohio counties had decreasing trends in mean soil test P (STP) levels between 1993 and 2015. Since 2003, Ohio's P2O5 removal through crop harvest has exceeded P applied as a nutrient, resulting in a net annual removal of 8 pounds of P2O5 per acre. Continued net removal would indicate that STP should continue trending downward, which has positive environmental impacts.
- The P2O5 mass balance of applied nutrients through fertilizer and manure applications minus nutrients removed through crop harvest ranges from -14 to 1 pound per acre in Ohio’s nine CRDs (Table 2).
Table 2. Net annual P2O5 use for Ohio Crop Reporting Districts for 2003 to 2022.
Net (Pounds P2O5 per acre)
CRD10
-11
CRD20
-5
CRD30
1
CRD40
-3
CRD50
-14
CRD60
-1
CRD70
-14
CRD80
-11
CRD90
-11
- P fertilizer recommendations developed in 1995 were modified, resulting in the reduced application of P fertilizer while still meeting crop production needs. Tri-state fertilizer recommendations were validated and re-released without significant changes for P use in a 2020 publication, Ohio State University Extension Bulletin 974 Tri-State Fertilizer Recommendations for Corn, Soybean, Wheat, and Alfalfa (Culman, et al., 2020).
Environmental Implications of CRD Data
Ohio's nonpoint source goals for improving water quality are related to nutrient management and reducing erosion. Figure 3 shows the map of CRDs, along with Ohio's major watersheds. Several watersheds align with one or more CRDs. For example, CRDs10 and 20 represent nutrient application activity in the Western Lake Erie Basin. The Great Miami River is impacted by CRD 40 and 70, and CRD 50 represents most of the acreage in the Scioto River basin. The data shown here can be used to anticipate water quality changes around P nutrient use.
The trend toward less applied P reduced the acute P loss around surface applications. One higher P loss scenario occurs when rainfall resulting in concentrated surface flows occurs near the time of application. Reduced application tonnage reduces loss risk from this pathway. The trend to remove more P through crop harvest than is applied in fertilizer and manure should result in continued declines in Soil Test P. Soil test P is one factor that can mitigate chronic P loss at the edge of a field. (LaBarge & Cochran, 2023).
Reason for Reduced P Use
Several factors have impacted farmer decisions in nutrient use since 1987. One factor was a 1995 collaborative effort to regionalize P recommendations (LaBarge, 2023). A second factor is the higher per-unit cost for P fertilizer since 2018. A third factor is increased education on fertilizer use from the implementation of Fertilizer Applicator Certification in 2014. Farmers are required to use the Tri-State Fertilizer Recommendations for Corn, Soybean, Wheat, and Alfalfa, Bulletin 974 for their P recommendations when participating in Natural Resource Conservation Service cost-share programs, the 2017 4R Certified Ag Retailer voluntary third-party audit program, and the 2019 Ohio H2Ohio program. Increased farmer knowledge of P use, technical assistance programs, and economic returns are all factors driving reductions in P use.
References:
Culman, S., Fulford, A., Camberato, J., & Steinke, K. (2020). Tri-state fertilizer recommendations for corn, soybean, wheat, and alfalfa, bulletin 974. College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, The Ohio State University.
extensionpubs.osu.edu/tri-state-fertilizer-recommendations-for-corn-soybean-wheat-and-alfalfaLaBarge, G. & Cochran, R. (2023). Understanding how soil test phosphorus impacts water quality [Fact sheet]. Ohioline. https://go.osu.edu/stpwq
LaBarge, G. (2023). Phosphorus nutrient use in Ohio [Fact sheet]. Ohioline.
https://go.osu.edu/ohiop -
Weather Update: Winter Weather Finally Arrives, But Will It Stick Around?
Author(s): Aaron WilsonFor Ohio, December 2023 ranks as the 2nd warmest December on record since 1895 and caps off the 4th warmest year on record over that same period. Dry weather was also the main story in December, ranking as the 45th driest December on record and continued a pattern we experienced over much of the fall. However, even with a weather pattern that typically brings a drier and warmer than average conditions in winter, cold outbreaks are bound to happen. This has certainly been the case over the past week, with temperatures plummeting into the single digits for lows and sub-zero wind chill values. Before the cold snap, widespread 1-3” of liquid-equivalent precipitation (rain and snow) fell across the state as well (Figure 1), helping to alleviate some of the dryness and lift rivers and streams back to normal seasonal levels. As of Thursday January 11, 2024, 47% of the state was described as at least abnromally dry with about 27% of the state in moderate drought conditions according to the U.S. Drought Monitor. With last week’s precipitation, improvements are likely when the new report is released later this week. For more information, check out the State Climate Office and sign up for our monthly and quarterly climate summaries.

Forecast
Frigid air remains in place early this week, but southwesterly flow on Tuesday and Wednesday will allow for a brief warm up with highs pushing back into the 20s for much of the state. Our next winter system is set to move in beginning Thursday afternoon through Friday, bringing periods of light, accumulating snow. Another shot of Arctic air will move in for the weekend, with highs falling back into the single digits and teens with overnight lows near zero. A more significant warming trend will begin early next week. The current forecast calls for between 0.10”and 0.25” of liquid-equivalent precipition over the next seven days, with much of this falling as snow (Figure 2).

The Climate Prediction Center’s 8-14 Day Outlook and the 16-Day Rainfall Outlook from NOAA/NWS/Ohio River Forecast Center indicate a strong probability that temperatures will be above average with above average precipitation also expected for the period January 24 – 30, 2024 (Figure 3). The average high-temperature range is 33-38°F, the average low-temperature range is 18-23°F, and the average weekly total precipitation is 0.60-0.80 inch.

Upcoming Events
Crop Observation and Recommendation Network
C.O.R.N. Newsletter is a summary of crop observations, related information, and appropriate recommendations for Ohio crop producers and industry. C.O.R.N. Newsletter is produced by the Ohio State University Extension Agronomy Team, state specialists at The Ohio State University and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC). C.O.R.N. Newsletter questions are directed to Extension and OARDC state specialists and associates at Ohio State.
Contributors
Disclaimer
The information presented here, along with any trade names used, is supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement is made by Ohio State University Extension is implied. Although every attempt is made to produce information that is complete, timely, and accurate, the pesticide user bears responsibility of consulting the pesticide label and adhering to those directions.
CFAES provides research and related educational programs to clientele on a nondiscriminatory basis. For an accessible format of this publication, visit cfaes.osu.edu/accessibility.


