CFAES Give Today
Agronomic Crops Network

Ohio State University Extension

CFAES

OSU Deoxynivalenol, DON, Resistance Screening Program-2024

This past year, with support from Ohio Corn and Wheat through the Corn Check Off, we established a pilot corn deoxynivalenol (DON) hybrid susceptibility screening trial. The objective of this project was to identify hybrids with partial genetic resistance to DON. Use these results with caution because this is our first year of data. This trial was conducted at three locations across the state that represent different production regions:  Apple Creek, Bucyrus, and South Charleston. While we had three different environments, the fact that the hybrids vary in maturity means that there is a chance that the weather was not conducive to ear infection and DON production by the fungus Fusarium graminearum during each individual hybrid pollination window. All locations had natural infection across all maturity groups, but to help increase the change of Gibberella ear rot (GER) development, and consequently, DON contamination of grain, we also inoculated plots at Bucyrus and Apple Creek. Since average DON contamination was not significantly different between inoculated and naturally infected plots at these two locations, the results are summarized, and hybrids are compared, by location. With a relative maturity spread of 18 RM, the pollination window at all 3 sites was 3 weeks from the time the first silks emerged until only brown silks were found.

We have been researching several management strategies to reduce grain contamination with this mycotoxin, but less emphasis has been placed on genetic resistance. Results from our previous work with a very small number of hybrids showed that partially resistant hybrids with naturally and consistently lower DON levels are easier to keep low than those that were highly susceptible. A total of 80 hybrids from 8 seed companies were included as part of this screening. While this is only a small subset of the hybrids that are planted in Ohio, the results below not only show the importance of hybrid selection but also can be used to help you begin to select hybrids with natural partial resistance to DON, or at the very minimum, avoid highly susceptible hybrids. With one year of data, we cannot guarantee that the hybrids with low DON this year will always have low DON across all environments. The only thing we can guarantee is that the high-DON hybrids are susceptible. This is an excellent place to start.  

The weather conditions at all locations in 2023 deviated from normal. All locations had below-average rainfall, temperature, and growing degree days. The only time of year that was above average at all locations was the month of August when 0.98-4.87 more inches of rain than the 10-year average fell. The full weather date for the growing season is summarized in Tables 2 through 4 below with full monthly data available at: Ohio Corn Performance Test (osu.edu). Weather conditions during pollination are critical with infection occurring while silks are still wet and relative humidity is >80% with temperatures between 59°F and 86°F.  

Table 1 below summarizes the DON ppm as an average across locations and at each location. DON levels values with an asterisk (*) are not statistically different from the lowest average DON level. The variability among some of the hybrids with high DON levels led to high coefficient of variation and LSD, especially at Bucyrus. A total of 13 hybrids had average DON below 1 ppm (range 0 to 2.4) and 28 hybrids had average DON below 2 ppm (range 0 to 4.1) at all locations. A total of 43 hybrids had average DON below 3 ppm at all 3 locations, but the range of DON for these hybrids was 0-6.5 ppm across all plots at these locations.

Plots were managed for high yield at all locations. At Bucyrus and South Charleston, tar spot was found at low levels in the fields just before tassel. Being overly cautious about damage to the plots, a fungicide was applied at both locations. At Bucyrus, Miravis Neo was applied at tassel emergence. In some of other previous trials, Miravis Neo reduced average DON levels when applied between tassel and green silk. This application may have helped lower DON levels in some of the hybrids that may have had higher natural levels of the toxin if not treated with the fungicide. At South Charleston, Veltyma, a fungicide not known to be effective against DON, was applied. This location also experienced a windstorm just before tassel which resulted in severe goose-necking during the pollination window. 

See full hybrid trial report here.

(Table 1) – DON contamination of 80 hybrids averaged across locations and across plots at each location.

     

Average DON (ppm)

Brand

Hybrid

RM

All Location Average

Bucyrus

South Charleston

Apple Creek

     

Dekalb

DKC55-54RIB

105

2.61

1.03*

0.65*

5.18

Dekalb

DKC56-15RIB

106

19.70

30.85

0.62*

18.10

Dekalb

DKC62-70RIB

112

1.66*

1.99*

2.27*

1.02*

Dekalb

DKC62-89RIB

112

9.11

10.55

2.05*

11.20

Golden Harvest

G97B68-DV

97

0.51*

0.63*

0*

0.64*

Golden Harvest

G98B99-AA

98

2.45*

2.36*

0.88*

3.33

Golden Harvest

G99E68-D

99

1.38*

0.77*

0.76*

2.3*

Golden Harvest

G00A97-AA

100

0.8*

0.83*

0.58*

0.89*

Golden Harvest

G01B63-AA

101

8.13

9.43

0.3*

10.75

Golden Harvest

G02K39-D

102

0.6*

0.57*

0.39*

0.74*

Golden Harvest

G03B19-AA

103

0.88*

0.38*

0.8*

1.42*

Golden Harvest

G06A27-D

106

1.49*

1.18*

0.4*

2.35*

Golden Harvest

G08B38-AA

108

0.96*

1.01*

0.86*

0.95*

Golden Harvest

G10L16-DV

110

0.89*

1.17*

0.65*

0.75*

Golden Harvest

G10B61-AA

110

1.14*

0.11*

1.16*

2.15*

Golden Harvest

G11V76-AA

111

1.59*

0.79*

0.65*

2.85

Golden Harvest

G12S75-D

112

0.92*

0.24*

1.45*

1.34*

Golden Harvest

G13B17-AA

113

0.39*

0.01*

0.76*

0.58*

Golden Harvest

G13D55-V

113

0.58*

0.05*

0.05*

1.38*

Golden Harvest

G14B32-DV

114

0.24*

0.09*

0*

0.52*

LG Seeds

LG51C62VT2RIB

101

0.42*

0.07*

0.55*

0.7*

LG Seeds

LG52C42RR

102

1.23*

0.38*

0.49*

2.45*

LG Seeds

LG58C48VT2RIB

108

9.53

10.30

2.5*

12.28

LG Seeds

LG59C72VT2RIB

109

3.06

2.8*

2.3*

3.70

LG Seeds

LG64C43VT2RIB

114

3.80

2.98*

0.5*

6.28

Check

Hybrid B

109

0.97*

1.28*

0.03*

1.14*

Check

Hybrid A

113

10.54

7.48

0.63*

18.55

NK

NK0295-AA

102

5.77

8.75

0*

5.68

NK

NK0367-AA

103

2.05*

2.57*

2*

1.55*

NK

NK0835-AA

108

0.85*

0.67*

0.75*

1.09*

NK

NK0877-V

108

2.57

2.2*

1.19*

3.63

NK

NK0922-V

109

0.89*

0.78*

0.06*

1.42*

NK

NK1082-DV

110

0.22*

0.12*

0.03*

0.41*

NK

NK1040-AA

110

2.43*

1.33*

1.72*

3.88

NK

NK1188-AA

111

3.87

1.94*

3.73

5.88

NK

NK1239-D

112

0.78*

0.06*

1.95*

0.91*

NK

NK1480-DV

114

0.13*

0*

0*

0.33*

PC SEED

PC 3305

105

0.93*

0.89*

0.32*

1.28*

PC SEED

PC 8408

108

6.30

9.00

2.35*

5.58

PC SEED

PC 5511

111

5.74

5.93

5.20

5.83

PC SEED

PC 4212

112

8.19

2.83*

2.17*

16.58

PC SEED

PC 6313

113

2.76

0.37*

0.84*

6.13

PC SEED

PC 5514

114

2.97

3.88*

1.77*

2.67*

PC SEED

PC 6616

116

6.28

5.33

1.15*

9.80

Pioneer

P0075AM

100

1.79*

0.97*

1.39*

2.8*

Pioneer

P04511AM

104

1.37*

1.5*

1.02*

1.42*

Pioneer

P0487Q

104

6.74

7.60

0.14*

9.18

Pioneer

P05757AM

105

7.41

11.35

0.82*

6.78

Pioneer

P0720AM

107

3.73

6.03

0.55*

3.03

Pioneer

P0859AM

108

3.02

2.07*

1.15*

4.90

Pioneer

P10811AM

110

2.72

2.09*

1.75*

3.83

Pioneer

P1136AM

111

1.58*

1.42*

0.98*

2.05*

Revere

Revere 0297 SSX

102

1.46*

0.66*

0.1*

2.95

Revere

Revere 0518 VT2P

105

0.67*

0.02*

0.06*

1.63*

Revere

Revere 0707 DGVT2P

107

12.55

11.80

2.15*

18.50

Revere

Revere 0918 VT2P

109

0.38*

0.3*

0.49*

0.41*

Revere

Revere 1307 TC

113

0.52*

0.11*

0*

1.2*

Revere

Revere 1577 VT2P

115

4.60

2.37*

2.70

7.78

Revere

Revere 1627 TC

116

2.48

1.74*

0*

4.45

Seed Genetics Direct

Direct 0101-DV

101

0.44*

0.4*

0.03*

0.67*

Seed Genetics Direct

AGI 3104PWE

104

1.74*

0.23*

2.5*

2.88

Seed Genetics Direct

Direct 9107-3010

107

0.37*

0.6*

0.4*

0.13*

Seed Genetics Direct

Direct 2107-V

107

1.06*

0.42*

0*

2.23*

Seed Genetics Direct

AGI 4107PWE

107

2.98

3.77*

1.82*

2.78*

Seed Genetics Direct

Direct 2109-D

109

0.39*

0.38*

0.33*

0.44*

Seed Genetics Direct

Direct 4109-AA

109

0.96*

0.44*

0.32*

1.8*

Seed Genetics Direct

Direct 3109

109

1.97*

0.23*

0.33*

4.53

Seed Genetics Direct

Direct 0110-3110

110

1.84*

2.37*

1.22*

1.61*

Seed Genetics Direct

Direct 3111-D

111

0.78*

0.31*

0.39*

1.45*

Seed Genetics Direct

AGI 4111PWE

111

1.77*

1.16*

1.15*

2.68*

Seed Genetics Direct

Direct 2111-AA

111

2.92

0.85*

0.77*

6.08

Seed Genetics Direct

Direct 4112-AA

112

0.41*

0.08*

0.21*

0.86*

Seed Genetics Direct

Direct 2112-AA

112

3.73

3.02*

5.05

3.78

Seed Genetics Direct

Direct 2113-3110

113

1.34*

0.55*

0.55*

2.53*

Seed Genetics Direct

AGI 3113PWE

113

4.94

4.83

2.64*

6.20

Seed Genetics Direct

AGI 3114PWE

114

2.61

1.49*

1.08*

4.50

Seed Genetics Direct

AGI 4114PWE

114

18.81

20.68

7.00

22.85

Seed Genetics Direct

Direct 8115-3110

115

2.46

1.3*

5.10

2.29*

Seed Genetics Direct

AGI 4115PWE

115

9.30

13.15

2.90

8.65

Seed Genetics Direct

Direct 8116-3110

116

1.89*

0.52*

1.05*

3.68

             
 

Mean

 

3.15

3.03

1.19

4.24

 

LSD 0.1

 

2.32

4.62

2.67

2.85

 

CV

 

99.75

130.60

134.68

57.49

Numbers with an asterisk (*) are not significantly different from the lowest DON level at the location

 

Weather data Planting to Harvest

(Table 2) Bucyrus weather data

Planting date: May 19th Harvest date: November 16th

Bucyrus growing season weather conditions

 

Temperature

Departure from Average

GDD

Relative Humidity

Rain

Fall

Departure from average

 

High

Low

Mean

10yr

30yr

 

Average

 

10yr

30yr

July

90.2

50.8

71.2

-1.7

-1.5

657

81.5

5.38

.68

1.33

August

89.2

44.2

67.6

-3.5

-3.4

550

83.3

7.11

3.82

3.72

April-September

88.5

38.3

63.6

-1.7

-1.0

2681

72.6

22.0

-2.7

-1.9

April-October

88.4

35.7

62.1

-1.8

-0.9

2864

73.4

25.3

-3.3

-2.0

(Table 3) Apple Creek

Planting date: May 26th Harvest date: December 13th

Apple Creek growing season weather conditions

 

 

Temperature

Departure from Average

GDD

Relative Humidity

Rain Fall

Departure from Average

 

High

Low

Mean

10yr

30yr

 

Average

 

10yr

30yr

July

89.6

53.0

71.7

-0.5

-0.1

673

76

3.92

-1.05

-0.63

August

85.4

48.6

67.7

-2.9

-2.7

548

81

8.11

4.87

4.39

April-September

86.5

41.4

63.1

-1.5

-0.8

2595

72.1

20.8

-4.8

-4.5

April-October

86.2

38.9

61.8

-1.3

-0.4

2792

72.8

24.0

-5.2

-4.8

(Table 4) South Charleston

Planting date: May 23rd Harvest date: November 20th

South Charleston growing season weather conditions

 

 

Temperature

Departure from Average

GDD

Relative Humidity

Rain Fall

Departure from Average

 

High

Low

Mean

10yr

30yr

 

Average

 

10yr

30yr

July

89.6

53.5

72.6

-0.9

-0.5

698

81

5.62

0.21

0.71

August

90.5

48.5

69.8

-2.1

-2.0

613

81

4.30

0.93

1.05

April-September

87.9

41.0

64.6

-1.8

-0.9

2837

74.2

20.5

-5.70

-4.80

April-October

88.0

38.6

63.1

-1.7

-0.7

3058

74.6

23.2

-6.30

-5.00

Thank you to the Ohio Corn Performance Trial and the Paul lab for the management of these plots. 

Crop Observation and Recommendation Network

C.O.R.N. Newsletter is a summary of crop observations, related information, and appropriate recommendations for Ohio crop producers and industry. C.O.R.N. Newsletter is produced by the Ohio State University Extension Agronomy Team, state specialists at The Ohio State University and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC). C.O.R.N. Newsletter questions are directed to Extension and OARDC state specialists and associates at Ohio State.