CFAES Give Today
Agronomic Crops Network

Ohio State University Extension

CFAES

C.O.R.N. Newsletter: 2024-09

  1. Spring 2024 Weather & Soil Conditions: Update 2

    Author(s): Aaron Wilson

    Air and Soil Temperatures

    Figure 1: Daily average air temperature (dashed red), two-inch (green) and four-inch (blue) soil temperatures for spring 2024. Soil type and location of measurements (under sod or bare soil) are provided in the lower right corner of each panel. A map of all locations is in the bottom right. Data provided by the College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences (CFAES) Agricultural Research Stations located throughout the state.

    Daily average soil temperatures remained steady or fell slightly for most locations this past week, with temperatures now in the mid to upper 40s. (Figure 1).

     

    Precipitation April 1-8

    Figure 2: (Top-Left) Precipitation (inches) for April 1-8, 2024 courtesy of CoCoRaHS. (Top-Right) Precipitation as a percent of normal (1991-2020) for April 1-8, 2024 provided by the Midwestern Regional Climate Center. (Bottom) Calculated soil moisture percentiles as of April 7, 2024 according to the Climate Prediction Center.

    This was due in large part to an active weather pattern that brought several rounds of showers and storms including 8 tornadoes (27 year-to-date) and flooding conditions to many parts of the state. Particulalry hard hit were counties across south central and southest Ohio, with an EF-2 tornado in Jackson County and  flooding conditions along the Muskingum and Ohio Rivers. Weekly precipitation tallied to 4-7” from Mercer County to Monroe County, while most of the state picked up at least 1.5” (Figure 2). This rainfall has saturated ground conditions across the state, evident by improved soil moisture indicators. These conditions are likely to remain saturated with another week of above normal rainfall expected.

    For more complete weather records for CFAES research stations, including temperature, precipitation, growing degree days, and other useful weather observations, please visit https://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/weather1/.

    Weather Forecast

    We began the week with some high clouds around on Monday, but overall, conditions were decent for the solar eclipse. A cold front will start to approach the area on Tuesday with scattered rain showers. Periods of showers and storms will be possible from Tuesday through Friday, with some locally heavy rain possible. We dry out on Saturday before additional showers move in for Sunday and Monday. Temperatures will range from the upper 60s to mid 70s on Tuesday and Wednesday, before a slight cool down ensues for Thursday and Friday. Temperatures will rebound back above normal by the weekend. Overnight lows should remain well above freezing this week. The Weather Prediction Center is currently forecasting 1.25-2.50” of additional precipitation over the next 7 days, with isolated heavier amounts (Figure 3).

    Precipitation Forecast

    Figure 3). Precipitation forecast from the Weather Prediction Center for 7pm Monday April 8  – 7pm Monday April 15, 2024.

    The 6-10 day outlook from the Climate Prediction Center and the 16-Day Rainfall Outlook from NOAA/NWS/Ohio River Forecast Center show above average temperatures are likely with near to above average precipitation (Figure 4). Climate averages include a high-temperature range of 57-62°F, a low-temperature range of 37-42°F, and weekly total precipitation of 0.85-1”.

    Climate Prediction

    Figure 4) Climate Prediction Center 6-10 Day Outlook valid for April  14  - 18, 2024, for left) temperatures and right) precipitation. Colors represent the probability of below, normal, or above normal conditions.

  2. Look Out for Nitrogen Loss Due to Heavy Rains

    The recent heavy rainfall events have implications on the fate of applied nitrogen (N). In the past two weeks, Ohio has received rainfall ranging from about 1.5 inches in the northwest to 6 inches in the central-eastern counties. Year to date, we are experiencing 2 to 8% higher rainfall than normal. Nitrogen loss is exacerbated under such excessive rainfall scenarios via three pathways: runoff, leaching, and denitrification.

    RUNOFF

    The amount and intensity of rain received in the past week may have caused substantial soil erosion. Fields with no cover or residue are more susceptible to N runoff. If N fertilizer was applied recently in such fields, especially without incorporation into the soil, there is high likelihood of N fertilizer being eroded out of the field.

    LEACHING

    The nitrate form of nitrogen is liable to leach down the soil profile. Leaching is more prevalent in coarse textured soils than fine textured soils. In addition to the amount of rain, the amount of N loss via leaching will depend on:

    Type of fertilizer used: Leaching loss of N depends on the amount of nitrate present in the soil. Fertilizers that contain N in the nitrate form such as UAN increase the chance of leaching loss because a large portion of UAN exists as nitrate form. According to Havlin et al. (1999), most of the anhydrous ammonia gets converted to nitrate in about 3 to 8 weeks whereas 25% of UAN is in nitrate form on day 1 of application and 100% of it is converted to nitrate within 1.25 to 2.5 weeks. Enhanced efficiency fertilizers that either include nitrification inhibitors or protective covering reduce the leaching potential by slowing the conversion of the source to the nitrate form.

    Crop stage: If the field was bare, nitrate leaching potential could have been substantial. The presence of a cover crop or wheat during this time of the year can reduce nitrate leaching. The N uptake of wheat during the dormancy or early green up stage is minimal, thus making nitrate liable to leach down. If wheat was in stem elongation phase, nitrate leaching is less likely due to increased N uptake and prolific rooting system of wheat at this stage.

    DENITRIFICATION

    When soil is saturated with water during or after the rain event, N can be lost to atmosphere via denitrification process. The denitrification process refers to the conversion of nitrate form into gaseous forms (NOx or N2). The amount of N loss depends on how long soil stays saturated and soil temperatures during waterlogging, with warmer temperatures accelerating denitrification losses. Table 1 shows the potential loss of N due to denitrification under saturated soil conditions for different periods in days and soil temperatures.

    Table 1. Potential loss of nitrogen due to denitrification based on days of saturated soil conditions and soil temperature. (https://extensionpubs.unl.edu/publication/ec155/pdf/view/ec155-2014.pdf).

    Time (days)

    Soil Temperature (degree F)

    N loss (percent)

    5

    55-60

    10

    10

    55-60

    25

    3

    75-80

    60

     

    STRATEGIC PLAN FOR N MANAGEMENT AFTER HEAVY RAINS

    If any of the above N loss mechanisms occurred in your field, especially after an N fertilizer application was made, it is important to supplement N to growing/upcoming crop to avoid yield losses. You can follow below given strategies:

    Estimate the N loss: The amount of N loss can be estimated based on the fertilizer type, time of application, crop growth stage, and soil water content. Lentz and Culman (2015) outlined a procedure in this article: Concerns for N Loss in Corn from Recent Storms

    Determine N in the soil: Pre-Sidedress Nitrogen test (PSNT) can be done to quantify the status of nitrogen in the soil. LaBarge (2022) outlined the procedure to decide if additional N would be needed in this article: Estimated and Soil Test Methods to Determine Supplemental N need after Flooding

    Look out for plant N deficiency symptoms: Yellowing of lower leaves or inverted yellow V pattern on leaves could be a sign of N deficiency in crops. If such symptoms persist after soils are no longer waterlogged and temperatures are not on cooler end, it might be worthwhile to consider side-dressing N. You could also utilize sensors to determine NDVI to calculate N fertilizer requirement. The description of some Apps is outline by Logan et al. (2018) in this article: Crop Nutrition Apps

    References:

    Havlin, J.L., J.D. Beaton, S.L. Tisdale, and W.L. Nelson. 1999. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. An Introduction to Nutrient Management. 6th ed. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ.

  3. Battle for the Belt: Season 2 Episode 2- Who Won 2023- Corn or Soybean?

    Season 2 Episode 2 of Battle for the Belt is now available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpchDAyDd-0&list=PLYlh_BdeqniJ4J-htcJ9Z5MjULk3E8Eqk&index=2

    In episode 2, Dr. Laura Lindsey and Dr. Osler Ortez summarize the yield results of each location for the 2023 season.

    Project Overview

    Battle for the Belt aims to answer four questions:

    • Which crop should we plant first- corn or soybean?
    • Which crop has the smallest yield penalty for delayed planting?
    • Can we adjust management practices to mitigate losses due to late planting?
    • How are insects, diseases, weeds, and other factors affected by planting date?

    Ohio locations

    The project had three locations; The Northwest Agriculture Research Station, the Wooster Campus, and the Western Agriculture Research Station.

    Last year’s project included five planting dates, which will be repeated during the 2024 growing season. Ultra early: late March to early April, Early: mid to late April, Normal: early to mid-May, Late: late May or early June, Very late: mid to late June. The corn side evaluated four relative maturities: 100- day. 107-day, 111-day, and 115-day. The soybean side evaluated four seeding rates; 100k seeds/acre, 140k seeds/acre, 180k seeds/acre, 210k seeds/acre.

  4. Forage Weeds: Fall Forgotten and Spring Startups

    Spring means rapid forage growth, but it also means rapid weed growth. Due to the variability of spring weather, there are often only a few opportunities to control emerging summer annual weeds, winter annuals missed in the fall, and biennials that are small enough to effectively control. To manage weeds before they become a problem in forages, it is important to scout and plan accordingly. Forage is a broad category, and the spring weed control plan can look very different between species and operations. The problem weeds and whether control is necessary are going to be different between permanent pasture systems and alfalfa fields, and highly dependent on the consequences of specific weeds.

    In established alfalfa, the decision for weed control of some winter annuals like henbit and field pennycress will depend on the severity of the weed presence, the age of the stand, and the end purpose of the forage. If the weed pressure is high, the stand is young, or the lower forage quality of the weeds interferes with the goal of producing dairy-quality hay, the weed control treatment may be worth the associated cost. In a grazing system, it may be more pertinent to control weeds in the spring to ensure weeds that aren’t grazed don’t go to seed. Numerous weeds can be a problem in forage systems. Reference the 2024 Weed Control Guide for specific recommendations following this general overview.

    Summer annuals are most effectively controlled when they are small in the spring. An example weed is common cocklebur, a summer annual that is competitive in forage stands. The seeds of common cocklebur are toxic to livestock and maintain toxicity when cut as part of hay.

    In established pastures, there are many effective control options for summer annual broadleaf control, including:

    • 2,4-D
    • Crossbow
    • PastureGard
    • GrazonNext

    Common Cocklebur

    Common Cocklebur Seedling Source: Iowa State Extension

    Winter annual weeds are most effectively controlled in the fall when they are small and have not lived through the winter, but there is a window in the spring to control anything missed. A winter annual that is always a concern come spring is cressleaf groundsel, due to its toxicity to livestock. Cressleaf groundsel should be actively managed; if an infestation builds up to where mature weeds with yellow flowers are visible, herbicide control is no longer an option, and the weed maintains its toxicity even after cut.  The first cutting of an area heavily infested with common groundsel will likely have to be discarded instead of sold or fed. There are limited herbicide options for control; in pastures and grass hay fields 2,4-D is an effective choice, but will kill any desired legumes present. Weeds can commonly be seen as pretty flowers by neighbors and left to bloom, be sure to scout property edges to lower the risk of a weed infestation jumping into the field the following spring.

    In alfalfa and legume hay, some of the chemical control options include:

    • 2,4-DB (Butyrac)
    • Pursuit
    • Raptor
    • Glyphosate (Roundup Ready alfalfa or spot treatment only)

    Cressleaf Groundsel

    Cressleaf Groundsel Source: Ohio State Weed Science

    Another group of weeds that we have a chance to control in the spring are biennials. Poison hemlock is a biennial that commonly finds its way into forages, moving in from field edges and fence rows. Poison hemlock is toxic when ingested by livestock and can also cause skin irritation. Poison hemlock is most often a problem in pasture systems that are overgrazed and where there is inadequate grass growth. Where other grazing options are available, animals tend to avoid this plant, but control of poison hemlock should still be a priority. Being biennial, it is most effective to control poison hemlock while it is in the rosette stage.

    For the control of poison hemlock in pasture systems, herbicide options include:

    • Remedy Ultra
    • Crossbow
    • Dicamba

    Poison Hemlock 

    All the previous examples given were broadleaf weeds, but there is also the opportunity to control grass weeds in alfalfa and legume fields in early spring. Roundup Ready alfalfa makes glyphosate and products such as Extreme an option. In conventional alfalfa fields, products containing clethodim (Arrow, Select Max, etc.) and Poast are effective at controlling grass weeds.  Weed control in forages is highly situational; it is important to read the herbicide label to ensure effective weed control, limit potential damage to desired forages, and to be aware of any potential grazing or harvest restrictions.

    Extra Resources:

    Managing Cressleaf Groundsel OSU Video

    Poison Hemlock OSU Video

     

  5. Narrow row corn- should we vary other management factors too?

    Optimizing corn yields involves considering various factors such as planting date, relative hybrid maturity group, row spacing, plant population, and other crop inputs. Growers, facing the challenge of unpredictable weather and the annual introduction of new products and hybrids, are continually seeking ways to enhance yields and improve operational efficiency. In recent years, there has been interest in producing narrow row hybrid corn, however, the availability of agronomic recommendations for modern hybrids is limited.

    To address this issue, researchers from the Ohio State University conducted a series of trials to elucidate various factors associated with narrow row corn production. These factors included hybrid selection, population density and documenting potential disease issues and response to foliar inputs of nitrogen and fungicide. The trials were conducted from 2016-2018 in two sites (South Charleston, high yield potential, and Hoytville, lower yield potential). For all trials, the row widths were 30-inch (conventional) and 15-inch (narrow).

    Based on the results from these studies, current agronomic recommendations related to hybrid relative maturity selection, seeding rate, and foliar input management were similar for 15-inch row spacing as compared to 30-inch row spacing. Conversion to narrow rows resulted in a negligible to modest grain yield (0-4%) and forage (0-11%) increases compared to conventional row spacing and may be insufficient to offset costs for conversion. For more details, please visit our new factsheet detailing these studies and their results: https://ohioline.osu.edu/factsheet/anr-0152.

     

    Authors: Victor Gomes, Wanderson Novais, Alex Lindsey, Osler Ortez, Peter Thomison

     

  6. Join a Farmer Forum on Drones and Weed Management

    Author(s): Eugene Law, PhD

    Does it seem like a new precision weed management technology is popping up just as frequently as weeds do in your fields? With the rapid pace of innovation in this area, it can be hard to stay informed of the most recent developments. In response to frequent questions about drone technology, the GROW network is hosting its first Farmer Forum of 2024 on Monday, April 15th at 2 pm ET to provide some insight into how drones are being used for weed management.

    Listen in – and bring your questions – as panelists from across the country speak about their experiences managing weeds with drones and following best management practices for this developing industry. Certified Crop Advisor (CCA) CEU credits will be available.

    Speakers:

    Rick Jordan, Operations Manager, CNY Drone Services, NY

    Tyler Mudd, Farmer and Drone Operator, Monroe City, MO

    Moderator Dr. Steve Li, Extension Weed Scientist, Auburn University, AL

    Registration is free! Sign up here.

    GROW, or Getting Rid Of Weeds, is a national network of weed scientists, extension educators, and outreach specialists working together to develop best practices and digital tools to support the use of integrated weed management to combat the herbicide resistance epidemic. GROW Farmer Forums are a series of webinars that allow farmers that are adopting these practices and tools to share their experiences with their peers that might be interested in trying out something new.

    To explore a variety of other integrated weed management resources, visit the GROW website, https://growiwm.org/

  7. ANR Factsheet: A Guide to Corn Growth and Development

    Author(s): Osler Ortez

    One of the critical activities in growing a crop is understanding and keeping track of its growth and development. Corn growth is related to the increase in size of an individual plant or plant component. On the other hand, corn development relates to the plant’s progress in stages of maturity (e.g., moving from earlier to later stages). In corn, vegetative development ends when reproductive development begins (Figure 1).

    Corn at Vegetative and reproductive phases

    Figure 1. Corn at vegetative and reproductive phases during the growing season.

    Yield formation is determined by three main components: plant/ear number per unit of area (early in the season), kernel number per ear (kernel rows per ear and kernels per row, mid-season), and kernel weight (late in the season). From planting to physiological maturity, plant structures initiate and grow; adverse conditions like flood, drought, heat, weed competition, nutrient deficiencies, and off-label applications during the crop cycle can negatively impact plants, their components, yield, and farm profits.

    An adequate understanding of corn’s growth and development is essential when planning crop management decisions and diagnosing yield-limiting factors in corn. For a detailed and complete description of how a corn plant grows and develops, access the following resource:

    A Guide to Corn Growth and Development
    ANR-0148:
    https://ohioline.osu.edu/factsheet/anr-0148   

     

    Authors Osler Ortez, Mark Licht 

  8. Using Dairy Manure with Newly Planted Corn and Soybeans

    Author(s): Glen Arnold, CCA

    In recent years, dairy farmers and commercial manure applicators have been moving towards applying dairy manure to newly planted corn and soybeans.

    Applying dairy manure to fields after crops are planted in the spring offers some advantages over applying manure before crops are planted. One advantage is corn or soybean planting not being delayed by the added moisture from the liquid manure. This delay can be costly if wet weather further delays spring planting. The second advantage is the liquid manure adding moisture to the soil that can enhance crop germination and emergence, especially if the weather turns off dry.

    As soon as a field is planted, the manure can be applied. This is true for both corn and soybeans. The seed is protected by an inch or more of soil. In university research the application of 10,000 gallons per acre of dairy manure has not negatively impacted crop germination and emergence on corn or soybeans. If the crops are emerging, manure can still be applied to corn but not soybeans. Newly emerging soybeans can easily be killed by the application of liquid manure. Corn can tolerate the drag hose through the V3 stage of growth without an issue.

    The nitrogen in the dairy manure will be a boost to the emerging crop. It is difficult to know how much of the ammonium nitrogen in the dairy manure will be available to the crop. The organic nitrogen portion will be a slow release over several years. The ammonium nitrogen in the dairy manure can be lost to volatilization and possibly leaching. In university trials of surface applied dairy manure, only about half the ammonium nitrogen applied seemed to be available for crop growth.

    When a drag hose is utilized, the drag hose applicator commonly applies the manure at an angle across the field. The field needs to be firm enough to support the drag hose to avoid scouring the soil surface and burying small corn plants or further burying seeds. Fields that are spring tilled are not good candidates for a drag hose. No-till fields, stale seed beds, fields with dead or alive cover crops, and tilled fields that have been packed with heavy spring rain are usually good fields for a drag hose.

    Additional on-farm manure side-dress plot results can be obtained by clicking on the On-farm Research link on the OSU Extension Agronomics Crops team website at http://agcrops.osu.edu/ or E-fields at https://digitalag.osu.edu/efields or follow OSU Extension’s manure research on Facebook at: Ohio State Extension Environmental and Manure Management.

    Ohio State University Agronomics Crops Team Youtube channel is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0nhw3GG6Q8&t=1s

     

     

Crop Observation and Recommendation Network

C.O.R.N. Newsletter is a summary of crop observations, related information, and appropriate recommendations for Ohio crop producers and industry. C.O.R.N. Newsletter is produced by the Ohio State University Extension Agronomy Team, state specialists at The Ohio State University and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC). C.O.R.N. Newsletter questions are directed to Extension and OARDC state specialists and associates at Ohio State.

Contributors

Amanda Douridas, CCA (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Amber Emmons, CCA (Water Quality Extension Associate)
Ben Torrance (State Statistician)
Clint Schroeder (Program Manager)
Curtis Young, CCA (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Dean Kreager (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Don Hammersmith (Program Assistant, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Eugene Law, PhD (Assistant Professor)
Gigi Neal (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Glen Arnold, CCA (Field Specialist, Manure Nutrient Management )
Greg LaBarge, CPAg/CCA (Field Specialist, Agronomic Systems)
Jacob Winters (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Jordan Penrose (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Kayla Wyse (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Kyle Verhoff (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Les Ober, CCA (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Mark Badertscher (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Nick Eckel (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Osler Ortez (State Specialist, Corn & Emerging Crops)
Ryan McMichael (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Rylee Kay Puthoff (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Ted Wiseman (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Trevor Corboy (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)

Disclaimer

The information presented here, along with any trade names used, is supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement is made by Ohio State University Extension is implied. Although every attempt is made to produce information that is complete, timely, and accurate, the pesticide user bears responsibility of consulting the pesticide label and adhering to those directions.

CFAES provides research and related educational programs to clientele on a nondiscriminatory basis. For more information, visit cfaesdiversity.osu.edu. For an accessible format of this publication, visit cfaes.osu.edu/accessibility.