CFAES Give Today
Agronomic Crops Network

Ohio State University Extension

CFAES

C.O.R.N. Newsletter: 2024-25

  1. Regional Crop Updates: July 23-29

    field of soybeans

    Dry conditions continue through most of the state with potential relief in the forecast. Weed escapes and economics of a fungicide application were common observations or question topics received by Ohio State University Extension Educators and Specialists this past week.

    Central and West Central – Caden Buschur of OSU Extension Darke County reported that soybean is in good condition and has reached R3 (beginning pod development) growth stage in Central and West Central Ohio. Corn is also in good condition overall and has reached silking. The region remains dry, and main field activities this past week including tiling and applying herbicides and fungicides. Waterhemp and giant ragweed escapes were reported, as well as volunteer corn in soybean fields.

    Southeast – Ted Wiseman of OSU Extension Perry County shared that the region is extremely dry, especially south of Interstate 70. Dry conditions have led to a low-yielding 2nd and 3rd cutting hay, and corn and soybean are both in fair condition. Fields are relatively clean, though volunteer corn in soybean fields was reported in Southeast Ohio too.

    Southwest – Gigi Neal of OSU Extension Clermont reported that corn and soybean are in good condition and have reached silking and pod development, respectively. Parts of the region thankfully received timely rains, but weed escapes continue to be a concern, especially waterhemp, giant ragweed, and marestail in soybean fields.

  2. Regional Corn Yield Forecasts for 2024: July 23 Outcomes

    field of corn tasseling
    Author(s): Osler Ortez

    Corn growth and development are progressing well across most of the state (Figure 1), though recent reports indicated limited rainfall and dry soil conditions potentially leading to crop stress in some areas. Despite the wide range of growth and stages across the state due to a wide planting date window this year, over 50% of corn fields have reached the silking stage, R1 (Figure 2).

    Figure 1. Corn at vegetative stages in Wayne County, Ohio, 2024. Figure 2. Corn at the silking stage in Clark County, Ohio, 2024.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Starting in mid-July 2024, the Yield Forecasting Center is providing corn phenology (stages) and forecasts of corn yield potential every few weeks. The center is led by a core team at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) that collaborates with agronomists and extension educators from universities throughout the Corn Belt. Forecasts can help researchers, growers, and industry stakeholders make management, logistics, and marketing decisions during the 2024 crop season. Forecasts cover 40 locations across the Corn Belt, including Western (South Charleston), Northwest (Custar), and Northeast (Wooster site) in Ohio (Figure 3).

    Figure 3. Locations for corn yield forecasts during the 2024 crop season. Source: Grassini et al. (2024). University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

    This article summarizes the methodologies used to forecast corn phenology and yield and it provides guidelines for the interpretation of results. The first simulation for the 2024 end-of-season corn yield potential and crop stage was recently completed. Table 1 summarizes results for the state of Ohio as of July 23, 2024.

    Table 1. Simulations of 2024 end-of-season corn yield potential and crop stage performed on July 23. Adapted from Grassini et al., 2024.

    Location

    Long-term average yield (bu/ac) §

    Range of Yp forecasts as of Jul 23 (bu/ac)¶ 25th

    Range of Yp forecasts as of Jul 23 (bu/ac)¶ 75th

    The probability (%) of 2024 yield to be: Below (relative to the long-term Yp)†

    The probability (%) of 2024 yield to be: Near (relative to the long-term Yp)†

    The Probability (%) of 2024 yield to be: Above (relative to the long-term Yp)†

    Simulated crop stage*

    OH

    Custar
    34,000 plants/Ac

    108-day hybrid

    May 17 planting

    231

    218

    239

    15%

    74%

    10%

    R3, Milk

    South Charleston
    34,000 plants/Ac

    112-day hybrid

    May 12 planting

    235

    192

    231

    53%

    44%

    3%

    R3, Milk

    Wooster
    33,000 plants/Ac

    106-day hybrid

    May 22 planting

    236

    236

    264

    5%

    59%

    36%

    R1, Silking

    § Long-term (last 20-plus years) potential yield at each location and surrounding area.
    Range of forecasted 2024 potential yields based on average planting date in 2024, indicating the potential yields in the 25th and 75th percentile of the potential yield distribution (associated with respective adverse and favorable weather scenarios during the rest of the season).
    Probability of obtaining a 2024 yield below (<-10%), near (±10%), and above (>10%) than the long-term potential yield at each location; or <-5%, ±5%, and >5% at each irrigated location, respectively.

    It is still early to make strong inferences about yields in Ohio since corn is at early reproductive stages, but preliminary projections show (Figure 4):

    • A 74% probability (+/-) of near average yield potential for Custar, OH.
    • About a 50% probability (+/-) of near or below-average yield potential for South Charleston, OH.
    • A 59% probability (+/-) of near average yield potential for Wooster, OH.

    Figure 4. On the left figure, simulated developmental stage for rainfed corn at each location. Vn: vegetative stage (nth leaf); R1: silking; R2: blister; R3: milk; R4: dough. On the right figure, probability of the 2024 yield potential to be below, near, and above the long-term (2005-2023) average yield potential at each location. Larger color sections within the pie chart indicate higher probability that end-of-season corn yield will be in that category. Source: Grassini et al., 2024.

    Crop conditions like temperature and water availability during August will dictate if the projections are maintained and what actual yields we get this year. The forecasts do not consider other yield-limiting factors such as crop stand issues, storm damage, replanting, disease, or nutrient losses. Results can deviate with varying planting dates or hybrid maturities. Yield forecasts are not field-specific and represent average yield estimates for locations and their surrounding areas.

    As more corn yield and phenology forecasts become available this crop season, short briefs will be released via the OSU C.O.R.N. Newsletter.


    References

    Grassini, P., Andrade, J., Merlos, F., Yang, H., Rees, J., Coulter, J., Licht, M., Archontoulis, S., Ciampitti, I., Crawford, J., Singh, M., & Ortez, O. (2024). 2024 Corn Yield Forecasts: Approach and Interpretation of Results. UNL Nebraska CropWatch. Available from: https://cropwatch.unl.edu/2024/2024-corn-yield-forecasts-approach-and-interpretation-results

    Grassini, P., Andrade, J., Merlos, F., Yang, H., Rees, J., Coulter, J., Licht, M., Archontoulis, S., Ciampitti, I., Crawford, J., Singh, M., Ortez, O., & Quinn, D. (2024). 2024 Corn Yield Forecasts as of July 23. UNL Nebraska CropWatch. Available from: https://cropwatch.unl.edu/2024/2024-corn-yield-forecasts-july-23

  3. Two August Field Days to Explore Barriers and Benefits of Crop and Livestock Integration

    Author(s): Cassandra Brown

    Over the last 50 years, both crop and livestock production systems in the U.S. have become increasingly specialized and separated. A two-year Ohio State project has partnered with 31 working Ohio farms to examine the economic, ecological, and social impacts of specializing or integrating these farming systems. During this event attendees will consider soil health results and other on-farm data from our two-year study, join in discussion with study participants about the benefits and barriers to integrating crop and livestock systems, and hear about specific strategies or issues from area farmers.  

    There is no cost to attend, but registration is required to receive the meal provided during the event. This project is supported by a grant from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture.  

    Two options to attend “Exploring Crop and Livestock Integration: Barriers and Benefits”

  4. 2024 Ohio Wheat Performance Test- Results Available Online

    field of ripening wheat

    Results from the 2024 Ohio Wheat Performance Test are now online by clicking here. This year’s report includes 84 winter wheat varieties and 17 brands grown in five counties (Wood, Wayne, Darke, Union, and Pickaway) (Figure 1).

    In fall 2023, wheat was planted within 14 days of the fly-free date. Fall growth was good, and wheat entered dormancy in great condition. Higher than normal growing degree days in March through June accelerated crop development. Wheat was harvested about 10 days earlier than normal, with harvest dates ranging from June 18 in Pickaway County to July 2 in Wayne and Darke County. Overall, wheat yield was lower than the previous year, likely due to higher levels of disease and shorter grain fill period. In 2024, average grain yield across the five counties was 83 bu/acre (90 bu/acre average high and 75 bu/acre average low). In 2023, the average yield across locations was 108 bu/acre (117 bu/acre average high and 95 bu/acre average low).county map of ohio

    The purpose of the Ohio Wheat Performance Test is to evaluate wheat varieties, blends, brands, and breeding lines for yield, grain quality, and other important performance characteristics. This information gives wheat producers comparative information for selecting the varieties best suited for their production system and market. Varieties differ in yield potential, winter hardiness, maturity, standability, disease and insect resistance, and other agronomic characteristics. Selection should be based on performance from multiple test sites and years.

  5. Battle for the Belt: Season 2, Episode 18- Planting Date and Weed Control Interactions

    wrestling belt in corn field

    Episode 18 of Battle for the Belt is now available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbf-dlV-jmc

    In Episode 18, we are with Dr. Alyssa Essman, Weed Control Extension State Specialist, at the Western Agricultural Research Station in South Charleston, Ohio talking about weed management considerations for different planting dates.

    Weed Control Considerations
    The critical period for weed control is the first four to six weeks after crop planting. This period is when the young plants are most sensitive to competition with weeds for resources such as moisture and sunlight. Timely weed management, especially within this window, will reduce yield loss potential from the presence of weeds. In situations where soybean or corn are planted, but inclement weather prevents us from being able to get back into the field in a timely manner, it is very important to refer to herbicide labels and the weed control guide to evaluate management options. In areas that have had dry weather, the use of adjuvants becomes especially important, as plants develop a thicker cuticle and the herbicide has a harder time getting into the plant.

    Weed Control in Corn – Western Site
    The fifth planting date (June 17) of Battle for the Belt has more weed competition than the other planting dates at this time, as the plants were not tall enough yet to fully canopy, and the weather had not allowed a post emergence application. The height of weeds, growing past the top of the corn, shows that the weeds have a competitive advantage. In these plots, the plants near the weeds are about a leaf in growth stage behind the plants that are further from the weeds. In earlier planting dates, there is greater canopy closure and fewer weeds.

    Weed Control in Soybean – Western Site
    In general, there are less options for chemical weed control in soybeans compared to corn. When soybeans are planted earlier, they tend to flower earlier, and this pushes pre- and post-emergence herbicide applications earlier as well. The first planting date occurred on March 25th and soybean plants were flowering on May 28th. Application of many post-emergence herbicides is restricted at the R1 growth stage. In the later planting dates, canopy closure is delayed and weeds are in competition with soybean plants. Weed species present in the field may change based on planting date, where the early planted soybean may compete with early emerging weed species, and later planted soybean may compete more with later emerging weed species. At the Western Agricultural Research Station in South Charleston, Ohio, soybeans planted at every planting date compete with giant ragweed. In the first (March 25th), second (April 16th), third (May 6th), and fourth (May 24th) planting date, the soybean plants are further along in growth stage and canopy closure (Figure 1), which helps to prevent weeds issues in the field.

    Figure 1. Canopy closure differences from left to right in planting date one (March 25), planting date two (April 16), planting date three (May 6), planting date four (May 24), and planting date five (June 17).

    If you have more questions about weed identification and weed control contact Dr. Alyssa Essman at essman.42@osu.edu or check out the weeds website, u.osu.edu/osuweeds.

    What’s happening in the field?
    At the Western location, every planting date of corn is in the reproductive phase of growth except for planting date five which is still in its mid vegetative stages. Disease and insect pressure are still very low in corn. For soybean, all planting dates have reached reproductive stages except planting date five. The first two planting dates have been in R4 for a few weeks as the crop continues to grow vegetatively. There is low disease pressure at this location, with no frogeye leaf spot found.

    At the Northwest location, the first planting date (May 16) of corn just reached R1; however, Northwest received rain after every planting date that has left some plots flooded, so about a quarter of the planting date one plots are behind in development because of the water damage. The rest are in vegetative stages and have had no signs of tar spot. Soybeans planted during the first planting date reached R3, and there is low disease pressure.

    Finally, at the Wooster location, planting date one corn is at R3, with planting date two at R1. In the third planting date, the 100-day hybrid is at R1 but the 107, 111, and 115-day hybrids are still in vegetative stages. There is very low disease pressure present at this location. The soybeans are all in reproductive stages except for planting date five. The insect and disease presence here is also low.

    Table 1. Weekly weather conditions for each planting date at the Western Agricultural Research Station, Northwest Agricultural Research Station, and Wooster Campus, with day of planting, soil, air temperature averages, and Growing Degree Days (GDDs) from July 22nd to July 28th. Information from CFAES Weather System (https://weather.cfaes.osu.edu/).

    Location

    Precipitation

    (Inches)

    (July 22-

    July 28)

    2-inch soil temperature
     (July 22-

    July 28)

    Air Temperature

    (July 22-

    July 28)

    Planting date

    GDDs

    (Cumulative)

     

    Soybean

    Stage

     

    Corn

    Stage

    Western,

    Clark County

     

     

    0.44

     

    Max: 84°F

    Mean: 76°F
    Minimum: 70°F

     

    Max: 90°F

    Mean: 73°F

    Minimum: 55°F

    March 25th

    April 16th

    May 6th

    May 24th

    June 17th

    2132

    2023

    1787

    1481

    1035

    R4

    R4

    R3

    R3

    V5

    R4

    R4

    R2

    R1

    V9

     

    Northwest,

    Wood County

     

     

    0

     

    Max: 90°F

    Mean: 76°F
    Minimum: 64°F

     

     

    Max: 92°F

    Mean: 72°F

    Minimum: 52°F

    May 16th

    May 23rd

    June 10th

    June 17th

    June 24th

    1670

    1504

    1175

    1031

    804

    R3

    R2

    V5

    V4

    V2

    R1

    V16

    V9

    V7

    V7

     

    Wooster, Wayne County

     

     

    0.41

     

    Max: 80°F

    Mean: 75°F
    Minimum: 69°F

     

    Max: 89°F

    Mean: 70°F
    Minimum: 52°F

    April 22nd

    May 3rd

    May 21st

    June 4th

    June 20th

    1721

    1616

    1379

    1161

    863

    R3

    R3

    R3

    R2

    V3

    R3

    R1

    V15

    V10

    V7

  6. Lep Monitoring Network – News on WBC and CEW, Update # 15

    We have just finished out our 15th week of monitoring for Ohio pests at the Lep Network. This past week, we have seen a continuation of WBC numbers trending down and a slight increase in the CEW average. As was mentioned last week, WBC populations across Ohio have most likely hit their peak numbers of the season and a decline should be expected. While we are most likely beginning to round out of the peak for this pest, any counties with averages that are still above 7 should continue scouting until their county numbers have significantly declined.

    Western Bean Cutworm numbers are peaking in many counties across the state
    This past week was our 6th week monitoring for WBC in Ohio. The statewide average for WBC decreased again from 1.9 during the week ending on July 21st to 1.0 for the week ending July 28th. The counties with the highest averages are Sandusky (19.0), Huron (7.0) and Henry (4.8) (Figure 1). While we are relatively certain that we have surpassed the peak in WBC moths for this year and are starting the decline, it is still important to be scouting for WBC egg masses (Figure 2). As mentioned above, if this week's average topped 7 moths in your county, see below for tips on how to scout for this damaging pest. Counties that should continue scouting this week are: Huron and Sandusky.

    How to scout for WBC egg masses:

    1. Identify fields with corn that is pre-tassel or just starting to tassel as these pests need tassels to feed on until the full ear forms.
    2. Examine the upper 3 – 4 leaves of 20 plants in 5 different field locations (100 plants for field), for egg masses (Figure 2).
    3. Record the number of egg masses found. Newly laid egg masses are a white/cream color that darken as they mature to a dark purplish color.
    4. If 5% of plants have egg masses, a treatment may be necessary. Be sure to time the treatment when the majority of the egg masses are mature (purple).

    To view a more detailed video on scouting – click here: https://youtu.be/qGjpwtfkObM?si=CFPzX1rlqt6jzyJw

    Western bean cutworm moth map
    Week 6
    July 22nd to July 28th, 2024

    Figure 1. Average western bean cutworm (WBC) moths captured from July 22nd to July 28th. The bold number on the left indicates the average moth count for the week, followed by the standard number on the right which indicates the total number of active traps set up in that county.

    Figure 2. Western bean cutworm egg mass under microscope Photo credit: Stephanie Pflaum, The Ohio State Department of Entomology, Wooster Campus

    Corn Earworm
    This is our 8th week monitoring for CEW pests in Ohio. The statewide average for CEW this past week has increased from only 0.02 during the week ending on July 21st to 0.18 for the week ending July 28th. The counties with the highest averages are Morgan (2.0), Clinton (1.0) and Auglaize (0.3) (Figure 3). To learn more about the corn earworm, check out one of our previous newsletters: https://agcrops.osu.edu/newsletter/corn-newsletter/2019-27/corn-earworm-field-corn-watch-molds

    Corn earworm moth map
    Week 8
    July 22nd to July 28th, 2024

    Figure 3. Average corn earworm (CEW) moths captured from July 22nd to July 28th. The bold number on the left indicates the average moth count for the week, followed by the standard number on the right which indicates the total number of active traps set up in that county.

Crop Observation and Recommendation Network

C.O.R.N. Newsletter is a summary of crop observations, related information, and appropriate recommendations for Ohio crop producers and industry. C.O.R.N. Newsletter is produced by the Ohio State University Extension Agronomy Team, state specialists at The Ohio State University and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC). C.O.R.N. Newsletter questions are directed to Extension and OARDC state specialists and associates at Ohio State.

Contributors

Alyssa Essman (State Specialist, Weed Science)
Amanda Bennett (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Amanda Douridas, CCA (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Barry Ward (Program Leader)
Bruce Clevenger, CCA (Field Specialist, Farm Management)
Bruce Clevenger, CCA (Field Specialist, Farm Management)
Caden Buschur (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Clint Schroeder (Program Manager)
Curtis Young, CCA (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Dean Kreager (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Don Hammersmith (Program Assistant, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Eric Richer, CCA (Field Specialist, Farm Management)
Eric Richer, CCA (Field Specialist, Farm Management)
Gigi Neal (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Glen Arnold, CCA (Field Specialist, Manure Nutrient Management )
Grant Davis, CCA (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Greg LaBarge, CPAg/CCA (Field Specialist, Agronomic Systems)
Heather Torlina (Water Quality Extension Associate)
Jocelyn Birt (Water Quality Extension Associate)
Josh Winters (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Kendall Lovejoy (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Kyle Verhoff (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Laura Lindsey (State Specialist, Soybean and Small Grains)
Les Ober, CCA (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Manbir Rakkar (Soil Fertility, State Extension Specialist)
Mike Estadt (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Nic Baumer (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Nick Eckel (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Osler Ortez (State Specialist, Corn & Emerging Crops)
Ryan McMichael (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Rylee Kay Puthoff (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Sarah Noggle (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)
Ted Wiseman (Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources)

Disclaimer

The information presented here, along with any trade names used, is supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement is made by Ohio State University Extension is implied. Although every attempt is made to produce information that is complete, timely, and accurate, the pesticide user bears responsibility of consulting the pesticide label and adhering to those directions.

CFAES provides research and related educational programs to clientele on a nondiscriminatory basis. For more information, visit cfaesdiversity.osu.edu. For an accessible format of this publication, visit cfaes.osu.edu/accessibility.