C.O.R.N. Newsletter: 2025-06
Breadcrumb Menu
-
Spring Nitrogen Recommendations for Winter Wheat
Author(s): Laura Lindsey, Ed Lentz, CCA
Winter wheat is beginning to show signs of green-up (Figure 1). Nitrogen fertilizer should be applied to winter wheat between green-up and Feekes growth stage 6. (If you need a reminder on how to assess if wheat is at Feekes GS 6, see this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_f3VrqzV5c) Nitrogen applied too early has the potential to be lost since wheat will use little N until after jointing. Urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN) or 28% has the greatest potential for loss and ammonium sulfate the least. Urea will have little potential for loss as long as it does not volatize. No stabilizer will protect the nitrate component of UAN, which is roughly 25% of the total N in UAN at application time.
Wheat fertility guidelines follow the Tri-State Fertilizer Recommendations for Corn, Soybean, Wheat, and Alfalfa (available here: https://extensionpubs.osu.edu/search.php?search_query=Tri-state§ion=product). Spring N rates depend on wheat yield potential (Table 1). If you prefer to be more specific, the following equation may be used for mineral soils, which have both 1 to 5% organic matter and adequate drainage:
N Rate = (1.33 x Yield potential) - 13
Table 1. Total (fall plus spring) nitrogen recommendations for wheat based on Tri-State Fertilizer Recommendations bulletin.
Wheat yield potential (bushels per acre)
60
70
80
90
100
Nitrogen rate (pounds N per acre)
70
80
90
110
120
As a producer, you can increase or reduce your N rate by changing the value for yield potential. Thus, a realistic yield potential is needed to determine the optimum N rate. To select a realistic yield potential, look at wheat yield from the past five years. Throw out the highest and lowest wheat yield and average the remaining three wheat yields. This three-year average should reflect the realistic yield potential.
No credit is given for previous soybean or cover crops, since it is not known if that organic N source will be released soon enough for the wheat crop. The Tri-State Fertilizer bulletin recommends that you subtract from the total (spring N) any fall applied N. We recommend taking no more than a 20 lb/A credit even if you applied a larger amount. Whether you deduct fall N depends how much risk you are willing to take and your anticipated return of investment from additional N. Based on the equation above and deducting 20 lb from a fall application, a spring application of 100 lb N per acre would be recommended for a yield potential of 100 bu, 90 for 90 bu potential; and 70 for a 80 bu potential. Â Nitrogen rate studies at the Northwest Agricultural Research Station over the past 20 years have shown the optimum rate varies depending on the year. However, averaged over years, yield data from these studies correspond well with the recommendation equation given above. These studies have also shown apart from one year, yields did not increase above a spring rate of 120 lb N per acre.
Wheat generally does not benefit from a nitrification inhibitor since temperatures are relatively cool at application time and the application is made to a growing crop, this is especially true as the crop approaches Feekes GS 6. However, urea may benefit from a urease inhibitor (products containing NBPT) if conditions for volatilization exist for several days after application. These conditions would include an extended dry period with warm drying temperatures (risk increases with temperatures above 70°F) and evaporating winds. Urea applications need at least a half inch rain within 48 hours to minimize volatilization losses unless temperatures remain relatively cool. The urease inhibitor will prevent volatilization for 10 to 14 days with the anticipation of a significant rainfall event during this time.
ESN or polymer coated urea will reduce the potential for N loss from leaching, denitrification, and volatilization. Since these conditions are unlikely to occur in most years, it may not be economical to use this product. Cool weather may prevent the timely release of N from ESN, so if ESN is applied, it should be mixed with urea or ammonium sulfate and be no more than 60% ESN.
A split application of N may be used to spread the risk of N loss and to improve N use efficiency. However, Ohio State University research has not shown a consistent yield increase from this practice compared to a single application after green-up and multiple applications are more costly compared to a single application. In a split system, the first application should be applied no sooner than green-up. A smaller rate should be applied with the first application since little is needed by the crop at that time and the larger rate applied closer to Feekes GS 6.
-
Wheat To Beat Project: Year 1 Results
Author(s): Laura Lindsey, Matthew Hankinson
Wheat farmers are interested in a variety of management practices. However, implementing these practices on-farm can be risky, costly, and time-consuming. In fall 2023, with funding from the Ohio Small Grains Marketing Program, we started a new project called the ‘Wheat To Beat’, giving farmers an opportunity to test management practices at three Ohio State University research farms- Wooster Campus, Northwest Agricultural Research Station, and Western Agricultural Research Station. Prior to planting wheat, we organized nine teams, corresponding to each Ohio Small Grains Check-Off districts (Figure 1). Each team selected management practices and products to be applied to wheat. We also had a ‘people’s choice’ team where wheat farmers selected treatments via survey distributed through the CORN newsletter. These 10 teams were compared to a standard wheat practice of 1.5 million seeds/acre seeding rate and a nitrogen rate of 90 lb N/acre applied in the spring.
For each set of management practices, we identified the teams with the greatest yield, profitability, and quality. The full Year 1 project report can be found here: https://stepupsoy.osu.edu/sites/hcs-soy/files/Wheat%20To%20Beat%20Year%201%20Report%202.pdf
Across the three research locations, Team #7 and Team #10 selected wheat management practices that resulted in the greatest yield (105 and 102 bu/acre, respectively). For comparison, the control treatment yielded 85.6 bu/acre. Treatments included:
Team 7
- Seeding rate = 2.0 million seeds/acre
- Fall application of 30 lb S/acre
- Spring N (60 lb N/acre + 45 lb N/acre + 25 lb N/acre) as split application
- Plant growth regulator
- Fungicide to flag leaf and at anthesis
- Insecticide
Team 10 (People’s Choice)
- Seeding rate = 1.5 million seeds/acre
- Fall application of 30 lb N/acre + 15 lb S/acre
- Spring N application of 122 lb N/acre
- Fungicide to flag leaf and at anthesis
Control Treatment
- Seeding rate = 1.5 million seeds/acre
- Spring N application of 90 lb N/acre
However, highest wheat yield did not translate into highest economic return. Across the three locations, teams with the highest (and statistically the same) economic return included Team 8 (partial return of $419/acre), Team 9 (partial return of $404/acre), and Team 5 ($397/acre). For comparison, the control treatment had a partial return of $404/acre and had statistically the same partial return as Team 8, 9, and 5. Partial return was estimated by subtracting costs of practices that varied among the teams from the gross return. Gross return was calculated by multiplying wheat yield (adjusted to 13.5% moisture) by the $6/bushel. Product costs and application costs were estimated from university enterprise budgets and custom rate surveys.
Team 8
- Seeding rate = 1.5 million seeds/acre
- Spring N application of 90 lb N/acre + 40 lb S/acre
- Foliar fungicide at anthesis
Team 9
- Seeding rate = 1.3 million seeds/acre
- Fall application of 20 lb N/acre + 15 lb S/acre + 10 lb Zn/acre
- Spring N application of 100 lb N/acre + 9 lb S/acre
- Fungicide to flag leaf
Team 5
- Seeding rate = 1.4 million seeds/acre
- Spring N application of 100 lb N/acre
- Foliar fungicide at anthesis
For grain quality, we considered factors that may result in a discount (test weight, moisture, shrinkage, and vomitoxin). Teams with the lowest quality discounts were Team 3 ($7.49/acre), Team 6 ($8.78/acre), and Team 2 ($8.96/acre). As a comparison, the control treatment had a discount of $9.92/acre.
Team 3
- Seeding rate = 1.0 million seeds/acre
- Fall application of 10 lb S/acre and 10 lb N/acre
- Spring N (30 lb N + 90 lb N) as split application
- Foliar fungicide to flag leaf
Team 6
- Seeding rate = 1.0 million seeds/acre
- Fall application of 20 lb N/acre and 5 lb S/acre
- Spring N application of 90 lb N/acre
- Foliar fungicide to flag leaf
- Plant growth regulator
Team 2
- Seeding rate = 1.0 million seeds/acre
- Fall application of 10 lb S/acre and 10 lb N/acre
- Spring N (30 lb N + 90 lb N) as split application
- Foliar fungicide to flag leaf
This trial will be repeated during the 2024-2025 growing season.
Crop Observation and Recommendation Network
C.O.R.N. Newsletter is a summary of crop observations, related information, and appropriate recommendations for Ohio crop producers and industry. C.O.R.N. Newsletter is produced by the Ohio State University Extension Agronomy Team, state specialists at The Ohio State University and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC). C.O.R.N. Newsletter questions are directed to Extension and OARDC state specialists and associates at Ohio State.
Contributors
Disclaimer
The information presented here, along with any trade names used, is supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement is made by Ohio State University Extension is implied. Although every attempt is made to produce information that is complete, timely, and accurate, the pesticide user bears responsibility of consulting the pesticide label and adhering to those directions.
CFAES provides research and related educational programs to clientele on a nondiscriminatory basis. For an accessible format of this publication, visit cfaes.osu.edu/accessibility.