Last week I had an opportunity to participate in The Ohio Country Journal Crop Tour (http://ocj.com/2013/08/2013-i-75i-71-ohio-crop-tour-summary/) which evaluated the status and condition of the corn and soybean crop in 40 counties across the state. I was part of a team that visited 20 fields in the western part of Ohio – the I-75 tour. Another team evaluated corn and soybean crops along I-71. We stopped at fields that allowed an assessment of a corn and soybean field in close proximity. Yield checks were based on the “Yield Component Method” described in last week’s C.O.R.N. newsletter (http://corn.osu.edu/newsletters/2013/c.o.r.n.-newsletter-2013-25/estimat...). However, time constraints (about 20 minutes per field) limited our yield assessments to no more than three sites within each field.
The following are some preliminary observations made by the I-75 team for corn.
Yield estimates for the 20 fields ranged from 160 to over 300 bu/A. (The yield range for the I-71 tour was 135-200 bu/A). More details concerning yield estimates are available at http://ocj.com/2013/08/2013-i-75i-71-ohio-crop-tour-summary/. Keep in mind that the Yield Component Method for estimating corn grain yield is probably only accurate within plus or minus 30 bushels of the actual yield.
In most fields, the corn crop had been established using conventional tillage following soybeans.
Plant populations averaged 28,800 plants/A and ranged from about 23,000 to 40,000 plants/A.
Of the 20 fields evaluated, we encountered one field planted in 15-inch rows and one planted in 36-inch rows. The remaining fields were planted in 30-inch row spacings.
Most of the corn was at the early dough stage. Some fields were at the late blister stage and are still vulnerable to kernel abortion which may occur until the dough stage.
Despite above average rainfall at most sites, foliar disease development was generally limited - primarily gray leaf spot and northern corn leaf blight confined to leaves well below the ear.
Very little insect feeding was present. Weed pressure was high in only one of 20 fields.
Despite the potential for N losses due to persistent rainfall, which saturated soils periodically, there was little evidence of N deficiency – “leaf firing”. If present, it was limited to the lowest leaves.
There was evidence of wind injury , root lodging and green snap, in 8 of the 20 fields. Green snap damage (associated with loss of stand) appeared significant in only two fields. It also did not appear that the root lodging present would impact harvesting.